dagblog - Comments for "But, Log Cabin Republicans Are Uncle Toms!" http://dagblog.com/politics/log-cabin-republicans-are-uncle-toms-14751 Comments for "But, Log Cabin Republicans Are Uncle Toms!" en Nah, I just wanted to say http://dagblog.com/comment/163879#comment-163879 <a id="comment-163879"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163876#comment-163876">Yeah, sorry I started a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nah, I just wanted to say "Idi Amin."  Don't worry about it, you're fine.  We're all fine.  And TMac ain't a fella.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:57:18 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 163879 at http://dagblog.com Think Progress reported a http://dagblog.com/comment/163878#comment-163878 <a id="comment-163878"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/log-cabin-republicans-are-uncle-toms-14751">But, Log Cabin Republicans Are Uncle Toms!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/09/11/831201/romneys-insensitivity-to-lgbt-people-i-didnt-know-you-had-families/">Think Progress</a> reported a disturbing piece about Mitt Romney's interaction with the LGBT community. His focus appears to be whether the business community believes that supporting Civil Rights is good for business.</p> <p>The economic argument that Log Cabin Republicans makes fails the smell test when you consider that the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2012/aug/29/democrats-better-wall-street-republicans" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: rgb(205, 0, 33); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: none; ">stock market</a> tends to to better under Democrats. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/08/job-creation-democratic-presidents_n_1501174.html" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: rgb(205, 0, 33); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: none; ">Job creation</a> is also greater under Democrats. If you like rhetoric on the economy, vote for the Republican. If you actually care about your personal income, vote for the Democrat.</p> <p>The late <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_J._Gomes" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: rgb(205, 0, 33); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: none; ">Peter J. Gomes</a>, a black, Gay, theologian Of the Harvard Divinity School was a registered Republican for most of his adult life. In 2006, Gomes switched his registration to the Democratic Party. He was conciliatory in his comments about Obama and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright flap. We miss his perspective on the current Republican Party.</p> <p>I think that one good thing that appears to be happening among church-attending blacks is that the GOP can no longer go into Ohio cry "Gay marriage is coming" and expect <a href="http://www.policymic.com/articles/10837/african-americans-will-vote-for-obama-despite-his-support-for-gay-marriage">black votes</a>. </p> <p>There was a subset of blacks who advised Martin Luther King to wait and not press the issue of Civil Rights. King's response was a book, " Why We Can't Wait". As the rights we take for granted extend to the Gay community because of their ongoing resistance, the Log Cabin Republicans can be counted on to tell us how they were the real reason that things changed. They are in a bubble.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:16 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 163878 at http://dagblog.com Don't call me fella, I am http://dagblog.com/comment/163877#comment-163877 <a id="comment-163877"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163875#comment-163875">Whoa, big fella. [Don&#039;t let</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't call me fella, I am still a woman.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:07:31 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 163877 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, sorry I started a http://dagblog.com/comment/163876#comment-163876 <a id="comment-163876"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163874#comment-163874">This argument has strayed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, sorry I started a diversion early before your blog got its proper response. I'm heading out for a few hours, maybe I'll have something productive to add later about the massive culture of taking offense. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:55:26 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 163876 at http://dagblog.com Whoa, big fella. [Don't let http://dagblog.com/comment/163875#comment-163875 <a id="comment-163875"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163870#comment-163870">I think you don&#039;t have much</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Whoa, big fella. [Don't let your head explode, that aint personal, it's just something us ignernt cowboys say sometimes] Do you mean on that internet where I could make a snarky statement that included saying women like Ayn Rand, who was crazy, and Phyllis Schlafly, who <em>is</em> crazy, and tmccarthy0, who I know very little about, share a view of the world and you would recognize that comparison as snark and not bother to respond to it? Cool. Glad I found out.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:50:36 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 163875 at http://dagblog.com This argument has strayed http://dagblog.com/comment/163874#comment-163874 <a id="comment-163874"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163870#comment-163870">I think you don&#039;t have much</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This argument has strayed into Idi Amin territory.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:38:35 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 163874 at http://dagblog.com I think you don't have much http://dagblog.com/comment/163870#comment-163870 <a id="comment-163870"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163869#comment-163869">Quick, somebody call Godwin.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you don't have much experience with internet snark.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:15:43 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 163870 at http://dagblog.com Quick, somebody call Godwin. http://dagblog.com/comment/163869#comment-163869 <a id="comment-163869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/163866#comment-163866">Although I don&#039;t know if they</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Quick, somebody call Godwin. Then somebody else call a historian. I realize yours was just a quick flip remark, but do you really equate  Ho Chi Min with Hitler and Pol Pot?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:19:21 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 163869 at http://dagblog.com I get more of a Stepin http://dagblog.com/comment/163868#comment-163868 <a id="comment-163868"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/log-cabin-republicans-are-uncle-toms-14751">But, Log Cabin Republicans Are Uncle Toms!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I get more of a Stepin Fetchit vibe, but the general point stands.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:16:52 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 163868 at http://dagblog.com I don't want to ever get in a http://dagblog.com/comment/163867#comment-163867 <a id="comment-163867"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/log-cabin-republicans-are-uncle-toms-14751">But, Log Cabin Republicans Are Uncle Toms!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't want to ever get in a folding chair swinging match with Barney but the the thing about the Log Cabin set that has always struck me is that they speak as if they have already won the culture war over discrimination against alternative sexual orientation so the fact that their economic policy preferences have caused them to join a coalition with folks who would have them burn in Hell is not really that much of a problem for them.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:16:47 +0000 moat comment 163867 at http://dagblog.com