dagblog - Comments for "Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he&#039;s the only one doing any work." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mitt-romney-guy-your-office-who-believes-hes-only-one-doing-any-work-14830 Comments for "Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he's the only one doing any work." en I suspect that quite a few http://dagblog.com/comment/164669#comment-164669 <a id="comment-164669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164662#comment-164662">Erica, I think you&#039;ve pegged</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I suspect that quite a few others see it as well, especially after the release of this video.</p> <p>I think the release of the video and the responses to it have also given people a glimpse of how the 1% operates, believing they're the only ones who REALLY matter, but conferring a very fake and shallow pretense of mattering on people who agree to vote for them. </p> <p>The sheer wackiness of the numbers in Romney's speech kind of pulled the cover off the reality of their view that taxes, and government programs of any kind (except for corporate subsidies) are regrettable impediments to their real interest which is making money in the cheapest way possible and squirreling it away in the best possible location. (Which of course, happens to be overseas, what with all these Americans demanding a decent life and a stable economy rather than accepting their inevitable descent into third-world status.)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:48:55 +0000 erica20 comment 164669 at http://dagblog.com Erica, I think you've pegged http://dagblog.com/comment/164662#comment-164662 <a id="comment-164662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mitt-romney-guy-your-office-who-believes-hes-only-one-doing-any-work-14830">Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he&#039;s the only one doing any work.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Erica, I think you've pegged him very well.  In addition, he's now and ever shall be the CEO.  He doesn't play well with others, and he thinks it's beneath him to come down to their level.  Whenever he has to, it's all he can do to keep from holding his nose.</p> <p>He's the last person on earth who should ever be president of the United States.  I hope we're not the only ones to at long last see that.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:10:47 +0000 Ramona comment 164662 at http://dagblog.com I would agree. A difference http://dagblog.com/comment/164567#comment-164567 <a id="comment-164567"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164566#comment-164566">Right, &quot;That Guy&quot; can</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would agree.</p> <p>A difference between the art communities and the business communities is that former's hierarchy is (to use evil buzzwords) generally horizontally aligned and the latter's is vertically aligned.  Those below the offender won't say anything to someone higher up the pecking order and those above the offender usually don't see the behavior in action because the offender is in kiss up mode.  </p> <p>I would add that in general with males this trait has the added expression of aggressive hostility toward others, which is of course the outcome of their cultural training.  This not only makes it more like the ugly American syndrome, but also adds a particularly annoying, if not threatening, facet to it.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:48:09 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 164567 at http://dagblog.com Right, "That Guy" can http://dagblog.com/comment/164566#comment-164566 <a id="comment-164566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164563#comment-164563">Gotta jump in here and say</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right, "That Guy" can definitely be "That Woman" as well.</p> <p>I will say, though, that I've worked in the arts and in regular business, and I think the "That Guy" syndrome is a little less galling in the art world. In the arts, the work is pretty hard and stressful sometimes, and every arts workplace has "That Guy" moments, but people usually manage to get over their cheap selves and admit that everybody has a job to do. (Because if they don't, the production is a disaster and nobody will get paid!) Artists are also pretty willing to let their colleagues know when they're dropping into smug martyrdom, and will tell them to knock it off--not always, but mostly, in my experience.</p> <p>In the corporate world, though, people are a lot less willing to be straight with each other, so "That Guy/Woman" can go on for years without being challenged.....</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:16:09 +0000 erica20 comment 164566 at http://dagblog.com Thanks tm! Maybe there isn't http://dagblog.com/comment/164565#comment-164565 <a id="comment-164565"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164561#comment-164561">Hah, spot on Erica.. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks tm!</p> <p>Maybe there isn't one in EVERY workplace.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:04:51 +0000 erica20 comment 164565 at http://dagblog.com Gotta jump in here and say http://dagblog.com/comment/164563#comment-164563 <a id="comment-164563"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164561#comment-164561">Hah, spot on Erica.. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gotta jump in here and say that men do not have a monopoly on this character trait, and my experience says it all too prevalent in the performance arts. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:04:11 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 164563 at http://dagblog.com Hah, spot on Erica.. I http://dagblog.com/comment/164561#comment-164561 <a id="comment-164561"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mitt-romney-guy-your-office-who-believes-hes-only-one-doing-any-work-14830">Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he&#039;s the only one doing any work.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hah, spot on Erica.. I definitely chuckled! I am pretty lucky now, I haven't met that guy at my new place of work, cause I work with almost all women and  dancers.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:51:24 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 164561 at http://dagblog.com I think it would be http://dagblog.com/comment/164555#comment-164555 <a id="comment-164555"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mitt-romney-guy-your-office-who-believes-hes-only-one-doing-any-work-14830">Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he&#039;s the only one doing any work.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think it would be fascinating if a former secretary, janitor, temp worker, or other worker with Bain while Romney was there who might not have paid federal income taxes could be located and interviewed on their reaction to hearing their former boss in effect say he thinks they are a bunch of freeloaders.  </p> <p>Politically engaged working stiffs who don't pay federal income taxes and whose boss is a known Romney supporter might be forgiven for fantasizing this week about walking out with their coworkers en masse from their place of employment, leaving a note to the boss saying that, since apparently they aren't viewed as actually contributing anything of value to the company, they figure the boss could do what needs to be done all by himself.  </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:35:08 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 164555 at http://dagblog.com Insightful post, erica20. It http://dagblog.com/comment/164554#comment-164554 <a id="comment-164554"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mitt-romney-guy-your-office-who-believes-hes-only-one-doing-any-work-14830">Mitt Romney is that Guy at your office who believes he&#039;s the only one doing any work.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Insightful post, erica20.  It effectively suggests narcissism wrapped up inside the perspective Romney's remarks reflect.  </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:06:35 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 164554 at http://dagblog.com Imma give you your mike back http://dagblog.com/comment/164532#comment-164532 <a id="comment-164532"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/164517#comment-164517">Supreme confidence is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Imma give you your mike back Dick, but I just wanna say, people - human people - should lay the fuck offa Al "THE GOD WHO CAME TO EARTH" Green. Don't do it. Unh uh.</p> <p>Don't touch it. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:14:59 +0000 quinn esq comment 164532 at http://dagblog.com