dagblog - Comments for "Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably" http://dagblog.com/link/seventy-percent-americans-view-israel-favorably-14996 Comments for "Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably" en Only 70% of Americans view http://dagblog.com/comment/165819#comment-165819 <a id="comment-165819"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/seventy-percent-americans-view-israel-favorably-14996">Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Only 70% of Americans view the Jewish State of Israel favorably? I would have guessed a higher number.</p> <p> It is ridiculous to go from there to a claim that this proves anything at all about the powers behind formation of our foreign policy and stunningly wrong headed to claim that that approval means <em>any</em> discussion about the powers which control or influence that policy is "evil" regardless the opinion held going in or coming out of that discussion.</p> <p><em> Some </em>Americans would love for discussions of extremely important and emotionally loaded subjects to be guided by fair minded common sense and respect for simple logic. That, friends, actually <em>is</em> a fact. The false assumptions stipulated here by the presenter as "facts" which should guide and limit further conversation on the subject probably explain why there is so little response.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:05:12 +0000 Anonymous comment 165819 at http://dagblog.com I like Iraq Veterans Against http://dagblog.com/comment/165781#comment-165781 <a id="comment-165781"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/165740#comment-165740">This might have something to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  I like Iraq Veterans Against the War, but Prysner is wrong about one thing: Al Qaeda are real enemies.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:44:48 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 165781 at http://dagblog.com This might have something to http://dagblog.com/comment/165740#comment-165740 <a id="comment-165740"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/seventy-percent-americans-view-israel-favorably-14996">Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/further/2012/09/29">This might have something to do with it.</a></p> <blockquote> <p>With that almost-unmentioned war far away still <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/09/10/we-are-at-war/"><strong>grinding</strong></a> on - to the tune of $2 billion a week and untold death and suffering on all sides - the extraordinary Winter Soldier<a href="http://sixstrings.com.au/?p=17"><strong> testimony </strong></a>of Mike Prysner, Iraq Veteran Against the War and founder of <a href="http://www.answercoalition.org/march-forward/"><strong><em>March Forward!</em></strong></a>, on <strong>realizing the enemy is a blinding racism that makes occupation and destruction of another country seem acceptable, </strong>and "the real terrorist was me." Brave man; his full testimony<a href="http://www.ivaw.org/blog/racism-and-war-dehumanization-enemy/mike-prysner"><strong> here.</strong></a></p> <p>"Our real enemy is not the ones living in a distant land whose names or policies we don't understand. The real enemy is a system that wages war when it's profitable, the CEOs who lay us off our jobs when it's profitable, the Insurance Companies who deny us Health care when it's profitable, the Banks who take away our homes when it's profitable. Our enemies are not several hundred thousands away. They are right here in front of us." - Mike Prysner</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:11:05 +0000 cmaukonen comment 165740 at http://dagblog.com Ok, I was curious who are the http://dagblog.com/comment/165678#comment-165678 <a id="comment-165678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/165675#comment-165675">Passport @ ForeignPolicy.com</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ok, I was curious who are the other "best friends" on the list and I found it:</p> <blockquote> <p>Q9. - AND WHICH ONE COUNTRY WOULD YOU NAME AS AMERICA'S BEST ALLY IN THE WORLD TODAY?</p> <p>54.0 ENGLAND/GR BRITAIN<br /> 15.9 ISRAEL<br /> 8.7 CANADA<br /> 2.3 CHINA<br /> 1.9 FRANCE<br /> 0.9 GERMANY<br /> 0.7 RUSSIA<br /> 0.6 ALL OF EUROPE<br /> 0.6 AUSTRALIA<br /> 0.5 EGYPT<br /> 0.5 JAPAN<br /> 0.2 INDIA<br /> 0.1 HOLLAND<br /> 0.1 GREECE<br /> 0.1 IRAN<br /> 0.1 ITALY<br /> 0.1 KENYA<br /> 0.1 MEXICO<br /> 0.1 NORWAY<br /> 0.1 SAUDI ARABIA<br /> 0.1 SOUTH AFRICA<br /> 12.3 DON'T KNOW</p> </blockquote> <p>But Passport is right that there's some other interesting stuff; I got kick out of a couple of answers to the following question:</p> <blockquote> <p>Q7. - WHAT DO YOU THINK PRESENTS THE LARGEST THREAT TO AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS TODAY?</p> </blockquote> <p>The top answer was</p> <blockquote> <p>17.1% TERRORISTS</p> </blockquote> <p>but there were also these two amusingly partisan answers to that:</p> <blockquote> <p>8.2% BARACK OBAMA/ADMIN<br /> 1.3% MITT ROMNEY</p> </blockquote> <p>"Barack Obama/Admin" actually made #2 with that percentage, #3 and # 4 were "Middle East" @ 6.5% and "Islam/Fundament/Milit" @ 6.4%.</p> <p>And then this one, which tells me that Michele Bachman types are not getting their message across <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> <blockquote> <p>0.5% COMMUNISTS/SOCIALISTS</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:06:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 165678 at http://dagblog.com Passport @ ForeignPolicy.com http://dagblog.com/comment/165675#comment-165675 <a id="comment-165675"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/seventy-percent-americans-view-israel-favorably-14996">Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/28/new_poll_iran_is_far_and_away_americas_1_geopolitical_foe"><em>Passport</em> @ ForeignPolicy.com has more on the poll, focusing on "who's our worst foe?</a>" but also talks about some other points, and has a link to <a href="http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/content/fpi-national-survey-foreign-policy-matters-2012">the poll results at Foreign Policy Initiative</a>, which I haven't looked at yet.</p> <p>From a quick google, it seems like everyone calls Foreign Policy Initiative non-partisan, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Policy_Initiative">including Wikipedia</a>, but I also note there that the <em>Board of Directors consists of Eric Edelman, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, and Dan Senor </em>so I am thinking to suspect a some neo-con skew to the polling and poll questions, and a skim of the summary results says I'm right on that. Still, Foreign Policy's <em>Passport </em>says it's definitely worth checking out in more detail and I trust their editorial.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:38:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 165675 at http://dagblog.com If we stick to recent years, http://dagblog.com/comment/165669#comment-165669 <a id="comment-165669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/seventy-percent-americans-view-israel-favorably-14996">Seventy Percent of Americans View Israel Favorably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  If we stick to recent years, I'm part of that seventy percent(I don't think things were always as good as they are now, though).</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:06:55 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 165669 at http://dagblog.com