dagblog - Comments for "Warren was good enough last night" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-was-good-enough-last-night-15019 Comments for "Warren was good enough last night" en bias against women in http://dagblog.com/comment/165924#comment-165924 <a id="comment-165924"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/165899#comment-165899">I guess I don&#039;t understand</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>bias against women in power</p> </blockquote> <p>I put it down to the catholic influence and specifically Irish catholicism.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:27:19 +0000 Flavius comment 165924 at http://dagblog.com I guess I don't understand http://dagblog.com/comment/165899#comment-165899 <a id="comment-165899"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/warren-was-good-enough-last-night-15019">Warren was good enough last night</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I guess I don't understand why there is this bias against women in power in MA???</p> <p>I had a similar view of the debate that overall she won and he didn't help himself.  What I've heard is that Scott Brown is more likeable but that Warren is seen as caring more about working people.  I think it is important to keep tying him down as a republican because he is one and that even if he may be less extreme than most current republicans in office, putting him in the senate could give more power to those extremists.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:35:17 +0000 synchronicity comment 165899 at http://dagblog.com