dagblog - Comments for "Pretty Little Liars" http://dagblog.com/politics/pretty-little-liars-15135 Comments for "Pretty Little Liars" en Which puts me in mind of the http://dagblog.com/comment/167319#comment-167319 <a id="comment-167319"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167316#comment-167316">Holy shit, OGD! Between you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Which puts me in mind of the (totally irrelevant) blurb I did for the San Francisco Tourist Board:"Visit San Francisco! Steep hills, short skirts, steady winds". They passed on it...</div></div></div> Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:22:38 +0000 jollyroger comment 167319 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I remember when Miley http://dagblog.com/comment/167317#comment-167317 <a id="comment-167317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167315#comment-167315">These are extremely prominent</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I remember when Miley Cyrus tweeted nude pics and cut her hair, while Lindsay Lohan went into rehab - undermined the fabric of our nation.</p> <p>Hope they get them into Congress soon - a good grilling, and then maybe a songfest is what we need.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:20:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 167317 at http://dagblog.com Holy shit, OGD! Between you http://dagblog.com/comment/167316#comment-167316 <a id="comment-167316"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167260#comment-167260">From first hand experience .</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Holy shit, OGD! Between you and Tmac, it's like, "visit dagblog, home of elite athletes..." </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:11:07 +0000 jollyroger comment 167316 at http://dagblog.com These are extremely prominent http://dagblog.com/comment/167315#comment-167315 <a id="comment-167315"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167264#comment-167264">I&#039;m basically with you on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>These are extremely prominent and very highly paid people whom other people look up to and model themselves on, like it or not.  When they are permitted to lie and cheat and abuse dangerous illegal drugs in the open, all while sucking up a massive amount of our economic resources, and then lie to the people's representatives about it, the spectacle of privileged unaccountability undermines institutions and fosters further public corruption.  Of course I suppose its no different than the massive, unprosecuted wave of Wall Street criminality that swept the nation this decade and crashed our economy, and that our weak and incompetent President and his crooked attorney general have allowed to go unpunished as well.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:10:30 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 167315 at http://dagblog.com I'm basically with you on http://dagblog.com/comment/167264#comment-167264 <a id="comment-167264"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167261#comment-167261">Why shouldn&#039;t they? Because</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm basically with you on this, DF.  Except that a woman running for Senate in Connecticut basically paid her way on the backs of contractors who she and her husband worked so hard, and expected so much from, that there's been an epidemic of deaths, some related to steroidal heart failure but most related to the painkillers you become addicted to when your muscles get so large they tear from the bone when you do a simple lunge...</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:24:07 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 167264 at http://dagblog.com This is the reality. It's http://dagblog.com/comment/167263#comment-167263 <a id="comment-167263"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167236#comment-167236">I guess the other thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is the reality.  It's like when people try to take away from Schwarzenegger's wins because he used steroids.  Many bodybuilders were experimenting with them back then.  He was still just better than his competitors year after year.  It wasn't even close, but it wasn't just because he was using.  Drugs don't pedal bicycles or lift weights on their own.</p> <p>There seems to be a lot of pearl clutching about what should be obvious: in a world where the use of performance-enhancing drugs is prevalent, a champion turned out to be among the users.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:47:00 +0000 DF comment 167263 at http://dagblog.com Why shouldn't they? Because http://dagblog.com/comment/167261#comment-167261 <a id="comment-167261"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167238#comment-167238">I don&#039;t get it. Baseball is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why shouldn't they?  Because it's costly and pointless.  Regardless of how personally satisfying you find it, can you point to a productive purpose it's served?  Not to mention that the fans didn't seem to mind.  MLB couldn't even get butts in seats until the steroid-fueled home run revolution took off.</p> <p>It's non-scandal scandal, perfect for Senators grand-standing, but it does nothing for the average American.  It amounts to fiddling while Rome burns.  I would think you would regard it for the distraction that it is.  Hell, sport itself is a distraction.  It's the last thing that our lawmakers need to be concerning themselves with.  "It's a business" just isn't a good enough reason for it to take that much priority.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:41:25 +0000 DF comment 167261 at http://dagblog.com From first hand experience . http://dagblog.com/comment/167260#comment-167260 <a id="comment-167260"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/pretty-little-liars-15135">Pretty Little Liars</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img height="35" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/default/files/pictures/picture-4147.gif" width="30" /><strong><em>From first hand experience . . .</em></strong><br /><br /> Back in the mid 20th Century (I'm old) for 6 years I competed at the highest levels of national and international track and field as a Triple-Jumper. For three years I competed as a member of the US Military <em>Council of International Sports Military</em> (CISM) track and field team while serving in the US Navy. My greatest achievement was jumping 53ft-11in. At the time the world record was 56ft-5in held by Joseph Schmidt of Poland.<br /><br /> I was told by a very well-known trainer of the time that there was but one way to increase my jumps and that was through the use of anabolic steroids. At that time I was 21 years old, 6-2 and weighed 172 pounds. By using, and in addition to a well-planned diet coupled with the weight-lifting regimen that I was doing at the time my body muscle-mass would have increased by 10 to 12 percent. My body weight would have increased to between 190 to 200 pounds within a three-month period of time.<br /><br /> There was testing at that time but it was very rudimentary. Although, being "a purest" that I have always tried to maintain I truly saw all of this as <u>outright</u> <u>cheating</u>. Couple that with my knowledge of others who had used and the physical problems that they had endured, there was no way I would take the chance of doing irreparable harm to my physical well-being.<br /><br /> Since those days I have coached many young athletes. My advice to them has always been, <em><strong>your competition is with and within yourself</strong></em> (personal best and all), if you can't do it clean...</p> <p><strong>DON'T DO IT!</strong><br /><br /> ~OGD~</p> <p>Michael... Thanks for this fine post and allowing the space for me to reminisce.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:09:07 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 167260 at http://dagblog.com Read the long drawn-out Roger http://dagblog.com/comment/167247#comment-167247 <a id="comment-167247"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167238#comment-167238">I don&#039;t get it. Baseball is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Read the long drawn-out Roger Clemens case - how much in taxpayer money and Congress' time was spent in showing prosecuter malfeasance and finallly his acquittal? In this case, it was the reputations of George Mitchell, Henry Waxman, Michael Mukasey that were destroyed over a period of 4 1/2 years. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:52:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 167247 at http://dagblog.com I don't get it. Baseball is http://dagblog.com/comment/167238#comment-167238 <a id="comment-167238"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167232#comment-167232">I&#039;ve really never understood</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't get it.  Baseball is an industry like any other, and it receives a substantial amount of legislative protection.  Why shouldn't it get grilled when there is suspicion that there is widespread law-breaking going on?</p> <p>Personally, I enjoy seeing the reputations of phony jock-hypocrites challenged publicly.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:08:04 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 167238 at http://dagblog.com