dagblog - Comments for "Oakland PD Cites 40 Cops for Misconduct , Fires 2" http://dagblog.com/link/oakland-pd-cites-40-cops-misconduct-fires-2-15142 Comments for "Oakland PD Cites 40 Cops for Misconduct , Fires 2" en Not sure what you're asking. http://dagblog.com/comment/167216#comment-167216 <a id="comment-167216"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167192#comment-167192">Since I have been effectively</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not sure what you're asking. </p> <p>Do I think you should be named in the blog-post itself? No, I don't. The blog is not done in fun, which means the debate is on an unfair footing, and so... no. </p> <p>Do I agree with your perspective on Occupy or the Oakland police? No, I don't. You lost your rag over the the Occupiers saying certain words, but when a few dozen cops get officially reprimanded, even fired, you're not nearly as worried.</p> <p>I think that's about all I'm saying on either of these two points, but hey - you two have a nice day.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:34:51 +0000 quinn esq comment 167216 at http://dagblog.com Since I have been effectively http://dagblog.com/comment/167192#comment-167192 <a id="comment-167192"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/oakland-pd-cites-40-cops-misconduct-fires-2-15142">Oakland PD Cites 40 Cops for Misconduct , Fires 2</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Since I have been effectively called out on this one, I would hope there will be those who disagree with me to step up and put it on the line.  There are those who would like to believe that somehow I am a good whipping dog because I reveal the weakness of the argument of the other side.  Yet this is never shown.  As with the Oakland police brutality accusation shows, my assertion that one needs to approach such events without the ideological prism in place is re-affirmed.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:55:39 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167192 at http://dagblog.com Q, you don't want to jump in http://dagblog.com/comment/167177#comment-167177 <a id="comment-167177"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/oakland-pd-cites-40-cops-misconduct-fires-2-15142">Oakland PD Cites 40 Cops for Misconduct , Fires 2</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Q, you don't want to jump in on this?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:14:06 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167177 at http://dagblog.com And i wasn't wrong about the http://dagblog.com/comment/167175#comment-167175 <a id="comment-167175"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167172#comment-167172">Trope, complains about &#039;over</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And i wasn't wrong about the cops.  I said they were innocent until they proven guilty.  Some were found guilty, more were found innocent.  Not to mention that most of those found guilty had nothing to do with physical brutality.  Put that in your pipe and smoke it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:07:52 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167175 at http://dagblog.com I call bullshit. You don't http://dagblog.com/comment/167173#comment-167173 <a id="comment-167173"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167172#comment-167172">Trope, complains about &#039;over</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I call bullshit.  You don't want to deal with your attempt to paint an entire police department as thugs because some were found to be thugs, something which I have never said was impossible or unlikely.  You want to paint a group with a brush based on the actions of the few.  When I bring up an example like the soldiers urinating on the Koran, you realize I am right and then say "i'm taking my ball and going home." boo hoo. </p> <p>Yes there are some police officers who stepped over the line.  And maybe if we investigate, we will find they were pumped up to be so by their superiors.  But does that mean we should paint all of the OPD, the majority of the guys and gals in the trenches as brownshirts?</p> <p>Face up to your ideological rants.  You can't be reasonable and extreme at the same time.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:04:30 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167173 at http://dagblog.com Trope, complains about 'over http://dagblog.com/comment/167172#comment-167172 <a id="comment-167172"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167170#comment-167170">The point is whether one</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trope, complains about 'over the top rhetoric', then throws out a 'koran urinator' accusation in his comments!</p> <p>You were wrong about the cops Trope, and your comment is vulgar trash, perhaps fitting and representative of you and how you think.</p> <p>Good night.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:56:52 +0000 NCD comment 167172 at http://dagblog.com I have also dealt with http://dagblog.com/comment/167171#comment-167171 <a id="comment-167171"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167167#comment-167167">No Trope, I am not an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have also dealt with crooked cops.  And I have dealt with cool cops.  There have been many times I could have busted on petty offenses, but was let go, and I, although white, am not a clean cut all-american by any means.  The crooked ones need to be dealt with, and dealt with harshly.  But there are also good cops, who try to do their best, who deal with a war zone and domestic violence craziness, and all the while perform within the standards both you and I expect them to.  Your reluctance to acknowledge these cops shows your ideological bent.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:52:44 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167171 at http://dagblog.com The point is whether one http://dagblog.com/comment/167170#comment-167170 <a id="comment-167170"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167167#comment-167167">No Trope, I am not an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The point is whether one wants to paint an entire department with the actions of some. Is one going to saying "there are some thugs in the OPD" or "the OPD is a bunch of thugs."  There were some soldiers who urinated on the Koran.  I don't judge all those who serve by those particular individuals' actions.  I don't think you would have done that.  But your over the top rhetoric is the same as a me saying since you served, you must be a koran urinator. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:45:02 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167170 at http://dagblog.com No Trope, I am not an http://dagblog.com/comment/167167#comment-167167 <a id="comment-167167"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167161#comment-167161">Part of my point, if it isn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No Trope, I am not an 'ideological crowd'. I have seen and dealt with crooked cops. I have seen them paid off in cash on the street, shaking down contractors in broad daylight.</p> <p>I am a military veteran who swore an oath to defend the Constitution, one who believes the citizens of this country do not deserve to be abused, assaulted or shaken down by police. Cops who swear a solemn oath, who are trained, paid and empowered to protect citizens and uphold the law. For those that do, their families and the nation can be proud.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:39:14 +0000 NCD comment 167167 at http://dagblog.com Part of my point, if it isn't http://dagblog.com/comment/167161#comment-167161 <a id="comment-167161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/167159#comment-167159">Dang it, one little slip of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Part of my point, if it isn't clear that you and your ideological crowd with your pitchforks and torches would have also hanged the 102 exonerated by the investigation.  And what would you have said to their families?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:58:59 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 167161 at http://dagblog.com