dagblog - Comments for "Unraveling the secret U.S.-Iran nuclear talks" http://dagblog.com/link/unraveling-secret-us-iran-nuclear-talks-15226 Comments for "Unraveling the secret U.S.-Iran nuclear talks" en Here is some more on the http://dagblog.com/comment/168369#comment-168369 <a id="comment-168369"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168368#comment-168368">I wanna see more on this from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is some more on the subject which may interest you.</p> <blockquote> <p>The perception is that Israel is going through the stages of sanctions, etc. not with the idea or conviction that at the end, the other side will yield,” he said. “If the purpose was to exert pressure to bring the other side to the table, the rhetoric should be different.</p> <p>“Obama does think there is still room for negotiations,” Halevy said. “It’s a very courageous thing to say in this atmosphere. In the end, this is what I think: Making foreign policy on Iran a serious issue in the US elections — what Romney has done, in itself — is a heavy blow to the ultimate interests of the United States and Israel.”</p> </blockquote> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> Read more: <a href="http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2012/al-monitor/israelsecurityiran.html?utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=4892#ixzz2A3C8rdHk" style="color: #003399;">http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2012/al-monitor/israelsecurityiran.html?utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=4892#ixzz2A3C8rdHk</a></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:41:48 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 168369 at http://dagblog.com I wanna see more on this from http://dagblog.com/comment/168368#comment-168368 <a id="comment-168368"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168367#comment-168367">A fourth question was who</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I wanna see more on this from the Times itself. I figure that they should still have sufficient shame from some of the stuff they fell for on Iraq, and what that did to their reputation, to not just double check but triple and quadruple check such sources and their possible motives.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:34:48 +0000 artappraiser comment 168368 at http://dagblog.com A fourth question was who http://dagblog.com/comment/168367#comment-168367 <a id="comment-168367"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168363#comment-168363">Uskowi on Iran: Iranian</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A fourth question was who leaked the prospect of talks and for what purpose? It may be charged tonight that the leak was at the behest of Obama to somehow improve his position but the most sensible sounding speculation I have heard is that it was a hostile leak by someone who wants the talks to not happen.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:21:24 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 168367 at http://dagblog.com Uskowi on Iran: Iranian http://dagblog.com/comment/168363#comment-168363 <a id="comment-168363"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/unraveling-secret-us-iran-nuclear-talks-15226">Unraveling the secret U.S.-Iran nuclear talks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.uskowioniran.com/2012/10/we-have-no-discussions-with-us-iran-fm.html">Uskowi on Iran</a>:</p> <blockquote> <div> Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi told a news conference in Tehran on Sunday that Iran has no one-on-one negotiations or discussions with the U.S.</div> <div>  </div> <div> [....]</div> <div>  </div> <div> Salehi did not say, however, that Iran will not have one-on-one talks with the U.S. Just saying that Iran and the U.S. have no such discussions now.</div> <div>  </div> <div> A U.S. national security council spokesman was forced to say after the report by the Times was published that the one-on-one talks with Iran have not been finalized, but he left the door open for such discussions in future by saying that the U.S. has always been open to bilateral talks with Iran.</div> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:59:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 168363 at http://dagblog.com