dagblog - Comments for "Where is the sacrificial nerd?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/where-sacrificial-nerd-15241 Comments for "Where is the sacrificial nerd?" en Even without the Sproul http://dagblog.com/comment/168626#comment-168626 <a id="comment-168626"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168615#comment-168615">It is pretty suspicious that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Even without the Sproul aspect, this is a case that bears some investigation--which I think the sheriff's dept is doing. At least, I hope they are.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:29:53 +0000 erica20 comment 168626 at http://dagblog.com It is pretty suspicious that http://dagblog.com/comment/168615#comment-168615 <a id="comment-168615"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/where-sacrificial-nerd-15241">Where is the sacrificial nerd?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It is pretty suspicious that the Republicans who've made such a huge deal out of voter fraud just want to sweep this under the rug.  Move along, nothing to see here, right?  They don't want their nefarious doings to be dragged into the public before the election; they'll wait and tie up loose ends after they've managed to steal the election.  I mean, just ask Mike Connell how effective the GOP is at tying up loose ends.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:18:57 +0000 Jamie comment 168615 at http://dagblog.com Thanks AD! I'm finally http://dagblog.com/comment/168611#comment-168611 <a id="comment-168611"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168606#comment-168606">Those interested in moving</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks AD! I'm finally finding out more detail about Small and hope to post more on the importance of his theological/political leanings soon.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:52:20 +0000 erica20 comment 168611 at http://dagblog.com Those interested in moving http://dagblog.com/comment/168606#comment-168606 <a id="comment-168606"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/where-sacrificial-nerd-15241">Where is the sacrificial nerd?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p jquery1351087112343="10"><em>Those interested in moving this story forward are encouraged to contact the Virginia State Board of Elections and request an investigation into the matter.</em></p> </blockquote> <p jquery1351087112343="10">Done.  Thanks.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:14:40 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 168606 at http://dagblog.com Yes, it would have been http://dagblog.com/comment/168585#comment-168585 <a id="comment-168585"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/168583#comment-168583">That mug shot is both scary</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, it would have been pretty easy to guess at political affiliation, although as the VSBE and others have pointed out, there is no proof that Small did so. The office is near James Madison U, so there's a good chance that some of the forms might have been filled in by Democrats. But the kid was hired to register Republicans, and most observers feel that the workers wouldn't bother filling in forms for Democrats unless they had to. (Apparently standard operating procedure is to pretend to be taking a poll, fill in a form for anyone who says they're Republican but just thank anyone who says they're a Democrat and walk away. Strategic Allied hasn't been very forthcoming about their methods, as you can imagine.)</p> <p>The mug shot is interesting--I've seen a few other photos of this young man and he is very short--5 feet or so. Makes him look less threatening than the mug shot!  :^)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:11:01 +0000 erica20 comment 168585 at http://dagblog.com That mug shot is both scary http://dagblog.com/comment/168583#comment-168583 <a id="comment-168583"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/where-sacrificial-nerd-15241">Where is the sacrificial nerd?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That mug shot is both scary and sad.  </p> <p>Maybe he just thought it was easier to ditch the forms than ask what his alternatives were.  Surprise!</p> <p>Although they did not indicate political party, I wonder if there was any common feature in them that Small may have inferred to indicate a political preference, e.g.  all women, a particular geography, etc.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:40:07 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 168583 at http://dagblog.com SMALL; is that the perfect http://dagblog.com/comment/168580#comment-168580 <a id="comment-168580"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/where-sacrificial-nerd-15241">Where is the sacrificial nerd?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>SMALL; is that the perfect moniker or what?</p> <p>And it involved 8 registration forms?</p> <p>We already know that Rove sent his troops to Ohio in 2004 and stole the election by planting machines (outsourcing for crooks) and using every dirty trick in the book to bamboozle the electorate. ha</p> <p>Did you know that Ohio officials mailed out circulars to its electorate informing them that this year's election will be held on Thursday, November 8th?</p> <p>So we end up with one SMALL; all roughed up by the bus that just ran over him. hahahahah</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:01:15 +0000 Richard Day comment 168580 at http://dagblog.com