dagblog - Comments for "Obama Unjumps Shark?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314 Comments for "Obama Unjumps Shark?" en That's one of the many http://dagblog.com/comment/169207#comment-169207 <a id="comment-169207"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169194#comment-169194">Seems like Obama is doing a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's one of the many downsides of private monopolies.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:49:35 +0000 DF comment 169207 at http://dagblog.com Agree with the points http://dagblog.com/comment/169201#comment-169201 <a id="comment-169201"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314">Obama Unjumps Shark?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agree with the points made.</p> <p>However, if Romney loses, isn't it true that one of the nation's basic freedoms, enshrined by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution as boldly proclaimed by the Roberts court in Citizens United, would be dashed on the shoals of countless ballot boxes?</p> <p>The American ideal would be set adrift that all things have a price, that dollars are speech, that God smiles on the wealthy, that the rich can silently and anonymously hold forth loudly and in triumph over the less chosen in selecting one of their own as the occupant of the highest office in the land. That principle cast asunder?  Like a Romney tax return, a Newt spouse or a Bain outsourced American job? I prefer not to believe that, until official results are in.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:48:28 +0000 NCD comment 169201 at http://dagblog.com Seems like Obama is doing a http://dagblog.com/comment/169194#comment-169194 <a id="comment-169194"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314">Obama Unjumps Shark?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seems like Obama is doing a good job.  He was prepared.  He's good at this stuff.</p> <p>Con-Ed and AT&amp;T are really ticking me off, though.  Obviously, they're not adequately staffed to get resources, for which they charge New Yorkers a premium, back online in a timely manner.  And yet both companies somehow have money to pay quarterly dividends to shareholders.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:51:22 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 169194 at http://dagblog.com Anyhow, glad to hear you've http://dagblog.com/comment/169186#comment-169186 <a id="comment-169186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169161#comment-169161">One of the hallmarks of the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">Anyhow, glad to hear you've finally learned to stop worrying and love the Obama.</span></p> </blockquote> <p>Does that make Obama <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/">'da bomb</a>? <img alt="laugh" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/teeth_smile.gif" title="laugh" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:46:19 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 169186 at http://dagblog.com A little more upbeat, http://dagblog.com/comment/169184#comment-169184 <a id="comment-169184"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314">Obama Unjumps Shark?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A little more upbeat, huh?</p> <p>Good for you!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:35:34 +0000 Richard Day comment 169184 at http://dagblog.com Enjoyed reading this. http://dagblog.com/comment/169166#comment-169166 <a id="comment-169166"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314">Obama Unjumps Shark?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Enjoyed reading this. </span></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:15:54 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 169166 at http://dagblog.com One of the hallmarks of the http://dagblog.com/comment/169161#comment-169161 <a id="comment-169161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-unjumps-shark-15314">Obama Unjumps Shark?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One of the hallmarks of the Bush years was the systematic staffing of all kinds of agencies with people who had no interest in seeing them run properly.  Another way to put it is that they didn't believe government works and aimed to prove it.  Despite any of the problems I could name with the Obama administration, believing in the basic mission of government is a significant contrast.  It would be nice, since we're apparently stuck with a two-party system, if we could have a loyal opposition party that believes government should do things differently while still believing that there ought to be a government and that the mission of said government goes beyond protecting basic property rights for the property-laden.</p> <p>The area where I probably have the greatest agreement with Obama is that he really seems to see government as having a role in creating fundamental advances in technology.  The government shouldn't make iPads, but it should make Internets, global positioning systems and space stations.  Of course, it could also borrow at zero interest and employ out of work laborers to repair our crumbling domestic infrastructure, but Obama wants to do that, too.  Actually, if the dude would back off of Alan Simpson's jock and shitcan terminally bad ideas like the disposition matrix, I wouldn't have many problems with his governance.</p> <p>Of course, that still leaves the issue of Congress.  Anyhow, glad to hear you've finally learned to stop worrying and love the Obama.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:28:00 +0000 DF comment 169161 at http://dagblog.com