dagblog - Comments for "What&#039;s the Big Idea This Election? Reality" http://dagblog.com/politics/whats-big-idea-election-reality-15336 Comments for "What's the Big Idea This Election? Reality" en I would say so. In the New http://dagblog.com/comment/169471#comment-169471 <a id="comment-169471"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169468#comment-169468">Nice. There are genuine</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would say so. In the New America, it's patriotic for poor people to give money to rich people...go figure.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:46:58 +0000 erica20 comment 169471 at http://dagblog.com Nice. There are genuine http://dagblog.com/comment/169468#comment-169468 <a id="comment-169468"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169317#comment-169317">Big idea of this election?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice.  There are genuine ideological differences at play here.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:23:31 +0000 DF comment 169468 at http://dagblog.com Wow, thanks. That's http://dagblog.com/comment/169467#comment-169467 <a id="comment-169467"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169309#comment-169309">Excellent post, DF. It hits</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, thanks.  That's incredibly nice of you to say.  I'll do my best to write more like this, though I can't say I have any particular hopes of being more widely published.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:22:42 +0000 DF comment 169467 at http://dagblog.com When I heard Obama's http://dagblog.com/comment/169466#comment-169466 <a id="comment-169466"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169308#comment-169308">&quot;You didn&#039;t build that,&quot; is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When I heard Obama's comments, I knew exactly what he was talking about.  My job would not exist had the government not created the Internet.  It's the perfect example of how government can make monolithic infrastructure investments that massively multiply private industry - just like the national highway system, GPS, etc.  Denial of this is childish and pervasive.  Maybe he could have chosen better words, but I think there would be screaming no matter how artfully he doused the kids with cold water.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:21:12 +0000 DF comment 169466 at http://dagblog.com Krugman's refrain that the http://dagblog.com/comment/169465#comment-169465 <a id="comment-169465"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169293#comment-169293">It would not be imprudent to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Krugman's refrain that the government is an insurance company with an army needs to become a mainstream mantra.  That's what it is on paper.  The deficit/debt talk all really irks me because it has nothing to do with the actual numbers.  Medicare is what's growing spending the fastest, but that's because of rising costs across the health care sector.  Nothing about it is sustainable.  People who aren't talking about that are just being silly about US debt/deficit.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:17:55 +0000 DF comment 169465 at http://dagblog.com I thought Romney said he http://dagblog.com/comment/169464#comment-169464 <a id="comment-169464"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169291#comment-169291">Preferential tax treatment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought Romney said he would repeal Obamacare, but replace it with something that would keep all the good stuff like patient protection.  At least, I'm sure he had something like that at some point.  Not sure of his current superposition.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:14:47 +0000 DF comment 169464 at http://dagblog.com Big idea of this election? http://dagblog.com/comment/169317#comment-169317 <a id="comment-169317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/whats-big-idea-election-reality-15336">What&#039;s the Big Idea This Election? Reality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Big idea of this election? Whether in a declining America, shitty really is just a different kind of fair.</p> <p>Democrats say no, Republicans say yes.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:37:49 +0000 erica20 comment 169317 at http://dagblog.com More on the withdrawal of the http://dagblog.com/comment/169313#comment-169313 <a id="comment-169313"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/whats-big-idea-election-reality-15336">What&#039;s the Big Idea This Election? Reality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More on the withdrawal of the Congressional Research Service report you cited:</p> <blockquote> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">.............</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">Congressional aides and outside economists said they were not aware of previous efforts to discredit a study from the research service.</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">..............</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">Jared Bernstein, a former economist for Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., conceded that “tax cuts for the rich” was “not exactly academic prose,” but he said the analysis did examine policy time lags and controlled for several outside factors, including monetary policy.</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">“This sounds to me like a complete political hit job and another example of people who don’t like the results and try to use backdoor ways to suppress them,” he said. “I’ve never seen anything like this, and frankly, it makes me worried.”</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">Janine D’Addario, a spokeswoman for the Congressional Research Service, would not comment on internal deliberations over the decision. She confirmed that the report was no longer in official circulation.</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">A person with knowledge of the deliberations, who requested anonymity, said the Sept. 28 decision to withdraw the report was made against the advice of the research service’s economics division, and that Mr. Hungerford stood by its findings.</p> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">..............</p> </blockquote> <p style="margin-top: 11px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; ">"Nonpartisan Tax Report Withdrawn After G.O.P Protest", Jonathan Weisman at the NYT yesterday, at <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nonpartisan-tax-report-withdrawn-g-144808999.html" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: rgb(205, 0, 33); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: none; ">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nonpartisan-tax-report-withdrawn-g-144808999.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:53:21 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 169313 at http://dagblog.com Excellent post, DF. It hits http://dagblog.com/comment/169309#comment-169309 <a id="comment-169309"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/whats-big-idea-election-reality-15336">What&#039;s the Big Idea This Election? Reality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excellent post, DF.  It hits what I think of as a sweet spot in between the two types of left-of-center MSM political commentary I observe: the overly watered down, too reluctant to call a spade a spade type of the otherwise excellent E.J. Dionne, Jr (aiming to win over more moderate readers), on the one hand, and hard left populism that can be a bit long on attitude and short on authoritativeness and thus ends up preaching mainly to the choir.  Would love to see more weighty pieces with edge like yours published in major media outlets.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:03:50 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 169309 at http://dagblog.com "You didn't build that," is a http://dagblog.com/comment/169308#comment-169308 <a id="comment-169308"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169294#comment-169294">If for no other reason,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"You didn't build that," is a perfect example of this.  Though I don't blame the Internet, so much.  Mainstream journalists who consider themselves so much better than bloggers reported it as a "gaffe," and out of context, without apology.  Look at any Time political writer and they'll uncritically call it an Obama misstep  even though it really wasn't and the point, that no person who built a business, did it without the help of fellow citizens who built the roads and bridges they rely on.</p> <p>The Internet doesn't help, but the low-IQ political coverage from big press outlets is killing us.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 08:56:50 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 169308 at http://dagblog.com