dagblog - Comments for "It&#039;s in the Bag!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362 Comments for "It's in the Bag!" en Keep the faith, Ramona. Oh, http://dagblog.com/comment/169595#comment-169595 <a id="comment-169595"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362">It&#039;s in the Bag!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Keep the faith, Ramona. Oh, wrong blog.</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:43:10 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 169595 at http://dagblog.com It's too bad ya'll invested http://dagblog.com/comment/169594#comment-169594 <a id="comment-169594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362">It&#039;s in the Bag!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 13px;">It's too bad ya'll invested in Romney, expecting that he'll lose and keeping the pathway open for ole Jeb in 2016. But Jeb's looking fat and somewhat long in the tooth, don't you think? Oh, and ya'll didn't count on Christie, huh? </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 13px;">I'm thinking Christie-Rubio in 2016, with Jeb as the Secretary of Business. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 13px;">And I know you're a "quart low" on math but what do you think the odds are of people voting in a second Harvard MBA after your dismal failure?</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:39:41 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 169594 at http://dagblog.com Romney is not the 'decider'. http://dagblog.com/comment/169554#comment-169554 <a id="comment-169554"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362">It&#039;s in the Bag!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Romney is not the 'decider'.  He is more of a not-so-artful dodger.  And if the American people were as stupid and lazy as Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, and the republican leadership think we are their entire campaign and strategy makes sense...</p> <p> </p> <p>What is it that Joe always says 'It's never, never a good idea to bet 'against' the American people.</p> <p> </p> <p>btw shouldn't you be in prison somewhere?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:10:52 +0000 synchronicity comment 169554 at http://dagblog.com We can always rely on you to http://dagblog.com/comment/169547#comment-169547 <a id="comment-169547"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362">It&#039;s in the Bag!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We can always rely on you to tell the truthiness, Dubya.</p> <p>[Sigh] If only Obama had waited an appropriate amount of time before speaking to the press about Sandy. Too bad that he doesn't have your crack emergency response squad.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:12:37 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 169547 at http://dagblog.com No worries decider. You were http://dagblog.com/comment/169526#comment-169526 <a id="comment-169526"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169523#comment-169523">but that one didn&#039;t really</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No worries decider. You were probably still drinking then so its totally understandable that you forgot. The whole campaign was probably just one long blackout.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:34:54 +0000 ocean-kat comment 169526 at http://dagblog.com but that one didn't really http://dagblog.com/comment/169523#comment-169523 <a id="comment-169523"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169520#comment-169520">n 1978, Bush ran for the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>but that one didn't really count. Dang, you liberals have good memories...</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:49:08 +0000 The Decider comment 169523 at http://dagblog.com n 1978, Bush ran for the http://dagblog.com/comment/169520#comment-169520 <a id="comment-169520"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/its-bag-15362">It&#039;s in the Bag!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>n 1978, Bush ran for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives" title="United States House of Representatives">House of Representatives</a> from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_19th_congressional_district" title="Texas's 19th congressional district">Texas's 19th congressional district</a>. His opponent, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hance" title="Kent Hance">Kent Hance</a>, portrayed him as out of touch with rural Texans. Bush lost the election by 6,000 votes (6%) of the 103,000 votes cast.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:43:27 +0000 ocean-kat comment 169520 at http://dagblog.com