dagblog - Comments for "We All Won Last Night" http://dagblog.com/politics/we-all-won-last-night-15386 Comments for "We All Won Last Night" en Well, I thought about a few http://dagblog.com/comment/169863#comment-169863 <a id="comment-169863"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169861#comment-169861">We all won? Well someone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I thought about a few exceptions but I didn't want their names in my title.  Especially Turdblossom's.  How would that look, for pete's sake?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:22:13 +0000 Ramona comment 169863 at http://dagblog.com We all won? Well someone http://dagblog.com/comment/169861#comment-169861 <a id="comment-169861"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/we-all-won-last-night-15386">We All Won Last Night</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We all won?  Well someone needs to call turdblossom and tell him so 'cause he is throwing an absolute hissy fit.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:47:29 +0000 The Decider comment 169861 at http://dagblog.com Some very evil people lost http://dagblog.com/comment/169750#comment-169750 <a id="comment-169750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169703#comment-169703">Of course, for there to be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Some very evil people lost last night!</p> <p>Oh but they are still good people on the 'inside' and...</p> <p>No, Akin and Murdoch and rush and sourcrauthammer and noonan and....</p> <p>These evil folks lost big big big last night.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:33:19 +0000 Richard Day comment 169750 at http://dagblog.com Everyone knew that Obama's http://dagblog.com/comment/169726#comment-169726 <a id="comment-169726"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169695#comment-169695">RE: But the country moved in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Everyone knew that Obama's win would be less strong this time and one could make the case that it was because the electorate moved right. Just as one could make the case that in 2008 the electorate moved left. I don't believe either of those ideas are true. A significant part of Obama's wins was neither right nor left. Both were reactions to the bad economy and desire for a change. The dissatisfaction and desire for change was away from the republicans in 08 and away from Obama in 2012. Yet still in this bad economy Obama didn't just get 271 but likely 332.</p> <p>If it were just the very moderate Obama who won I wouldn't think we have a left ward shift. But we won almost all across the board. One more state legalized medical marijuana and 2 states legalized it outright. Two states voted to legalize same sex marriage. After years of trying and a slow left ward shift we've reached a tipping point on these issues. This will only continue.</p> <p>Both Akins and Mourdock lost. One could make the case this was just about abortions for rape victims or insulting unscientific talk about a women's body shutting down. I disagree. First these weren't gaffs, a significant minority of people believe life begins at conception and all abortions should be banned. They think they are in the majority. They are not. I believe, while uncomfortable with abortion, a majority believes it should be legal at least in the first trimester. Those who are at least that much pro-choice have not been voting that issue because they felt it was safe. Akins and Mourdock as well as the overall republican position convinced enough that they better vote that issue before abortions were banned. I also believe the election of Kaine had something to do with republican's push for vaginal ultrasounds for those seeking abortions.</p> <p>The first openly gay senator was elected. Without her sexual orientation being a big campaign issue.</p> <p>Warren wins in Mass. I know Mass is very blue but Brown was well liked and an incumbent while Warren could be easily tagged as an out of touch elitist. He still lost.</p> <p>The economy is still the most important issue and all these gains could easily be lost if there are not significant improvement in the unemployment rate in the next two to four years. But I think there is a clear left ward shift in the electorate. No it has not become liberal and it will take some years for that shift to become obvious. But age based demographics are clear that it will continue.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:12:47 +0000 ocean-kat comment 169726 at http://dagblog.com My goodness it is fun when http://dagblog.com/comment/169724#comment-169724 <a id="comment-169724"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/we-all-won-last-night-15386">We All Won Last Night</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My goodness it is fun when your side wins!</p> <p>And unlike the Super Bowl, this contest means something!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:09:52 +0000 Richard Day comment 169724 at http://dagblog.com This is your #1 big loser http://dagblog.com/comment/169706#comment-169706 <a id="comment-169706"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169703#comment-169703">Of course, for there to be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is your #1 big loser here, mho:</p> <p><em> - Super PACs.  Also: Sheldon Adelson.</em></p> <p>Who's afraid of the big bad Citizen's United? At least until "they" can learn to move away from the overkill, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-romney-little-girl-cry-145605083--election.html">making little girls cry</a>? Best to go back to the traditional ways and means, lobbying Congress....the Madison Avenue profession of influencing the public isn't as easy as it first appears?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:43:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 169706 at http://dagblog.com Of course, for there to be http://dagblog.com/comment/169703#comment-169703 <a id="comment-169703"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/we-all-won-last-night-15386">We All Won Last Night</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course, for there to be winners, there must be losers.  We didn't all win last night.  Here's my list of winners and losers:</p> <p>WINNERS:</p> <p> - Barack Obama, one of the most embattled Presidents in recent memory.</p> <p> - Democrats generally, who retained their Prez and picked up valuable Senate seats.</p> <p> - Anyone who has a vested interest in a more liberal SCOTUS.</p> <p> - Mothereffing wizards, those who still believe in the magic of numbers, people looking for Rainbow Connection, etc.</p> <p> - LGBT rights, which are civil rights.</p> <p> - Unambiguously: Big Bird.</p> <p> - Jay-Z, Katy Perry, the Boss.</p> <p> - Somehow, Herman Cain. Also: Chris Christie.</p> <p> - Anyone looking to put this relentless election cycle in the rear-view mirror.</p> <p>LOSERS:</p> <p> - Conservatism in general, including the following people specifically: Dick Morris, Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, Donald Trump, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and probably Joe Scarborough's upper lip once they're done counting Florida.</p> <p> - Go-Go 80's Reaganaut Drug Warriors who still maintain that smoking a joint is a moral crime on par with murder and rape.</p> <p> - Unskewed polls.</p> <p> - Political pundits.</p> <p> - Tone-deaf white guys running for office who are suddenly taken hold by an unshakeable feeling that the path to political power is paved with impromptu symposiums on the nexus between rape and reproductive rights.</p> <p> - Super PACs.  Also: Sheldon Adelson.</p> <p> - Meatloaf, Kid Rock, Ted Nugent, Rafalca, Tagg Romney, Rudolph Giuliani.</p> <p> - Chik-Fil-A.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:11:00 +0000 DF comment 169703 at http://dagblog.com RE: We're more polarized http://dagblog.com/comment/169702#comment-169702 <a id="comment-169702"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169697#comment-169697">Well, I&#039;m not saying the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>RE:  <em>We're more polarized than ever.</em></p> <p>The new strength of a sort of 50/50 split being reiterated once again worries me a lot. Bill Clinton maintained a 2/3 approval rating through most of his second term. Most of my lifetime the political situation could usually be attributed to the 1/3 conservative crazies fighting the rest of the country. I wish to see evidence of returning to that rather than moving away from it. But I am not seeing it.</p> <p>Rising tides lifting a lot of boats usually helps the most with the moderation, let's hope Obama can see that happens even with an obstructionist Congress.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:09:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 169702 at http://dagblog.com Amen, Mona! http://dagblog.com/comment/169699#comment-169699 <a id="comment-169699"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/we-all-won-last-night-15386">We All Won Last Night</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Amen, Mona!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:02:36 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 169699 at http://dagblog.com Not new news to http://dagblog.com/comment/169698#comment-169698 <a id="comment-169698"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/169697#comment-169697">Well, I&#039;m not saying the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not  new news to me:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/parenting-gays-more-common-south-census-shows-8634">Parenting by Gays More Common in the South, Census Shows</a></p> <div class="submit"> <span style="font-size:13px;"><span class="submitted">by <a href="http://dagblog.com/users/artappraiser" title="View user profile.">artappraiser</a> <span class="created">1/19/2011 - 12:20 pm </span><span> </span></span></span></div> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">By Sabrina Tavernise, <em>New York Times</em>, <strong>January 18/19, 2011</strong></span></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:00:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 169698 at http://dagblog.com