dagblog - Comments for "Susan Rice May Have Major Financial Stake in Keystone Pipeline"

I haven't seen the left

Elusive Trope — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:57:56 +0000

In reply to Only reason this struck me

I haven't seen the left bashing her, as much as voice a concern about this investment, and the need for her to drop it if she were to get the job. I haven't seen anyone say that because she decided to invest in the pipeline should count against her getting the job (although there are probably a few environmentalists who might make such a claim).

Only reason this struck me

artappraiser — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:29:28 +0000

In reply to Susan Rice May Have Major Financial Stake in Keystone Pipeline

Only reason this struck me enough to post it is that new bashing coming from the left, as well as the right, seems to spell almost certain doom for a nomination getting approved....

So Karl Rove had investments

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:10:10 +0000

In reply to Susan Rice May Have Major Financial Stake in Keystone Pipeline

So Karl Rove had investments in what all, and he took forever to put anything into a blind trust, and I think Cheney was still getting payouts from Halliburton while VP. If Susan Rice gets the job, she can sell off her Canadian investments the next day - who cares?

The same could be said of

Elusive Trope — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:16:42 +0000

In reply to With her vast accumulation of

The same could be said of Hillary Clinton who has a much accumulation of wealth as Rice.

With her vast accumulation of

NCD — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:44:45 +0000

In reply to Susan Rice May Have Major Financial Stake in Keystone Pipeline

With her vast accumulation of wealth in the last couple decades, she seems more qualified to run a hedge fund than Dept. of State. Wiki says during the Clinton years she got a top government job related to Africa, having had zero experience doing any actual work there.