dagblog - Comments for "Still Can&#039;t Quit Brooks" http://dagblog.com/politics/still-cant-quit-brooks-15918 Comments for "Still Can't Quit Brooks" en I love your anti-crush on http://dagblog.com/comment/172728#comment-172728 <a id="comment-172728"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/still-cant-quit-brooks-15918">Still Can&#039;t Quit Brooks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I love your anti-crush on David Brooks. I think I might have a crush on your anti-crush (not on David Brooks, you understand--on your not-crush on David Brooks). I don't read anything he writes because I think he's an idiot. I just love reading what you write about the fact that he is.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:26:20 +0000 Orlando comment 172728 at http://dagblog.com I laud your brevity, Michael. http://dagblog.com/comment/172594#comment-172594 <a id="comment-172594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/still-cant-quit-brooks-15918">Still Can&#039;t Quit Brooks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I laud your brevity, Michael. Brooks is being an ass, and you are not. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:56:56 +0000 acanuck comment 172594 at http://dagblog.com Uh uh, Michael; not if it had http://dagblog.com/comment/172509#comment-172509 <a id="comment-172509"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172461#comment-172461">Happy New Year, Res. (But,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Uh uh, Michael; not if it had anything to do with money.  I don't understand money matters<em> at all</em>. </p> <p>You would just have to make an ass of yourself without me.  Sorry.  (Lord knows I've done it alone plenty of times. <img alt="blush" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/embaressed_smile.gif" title="blush" width="20" />)</p> <p>However, even an economics idiot like me can see that Brooks is digging a deep, deep, very deep hole.  How mortifying for him.  And deliciously satisfying for us. (Let's just let him keep on digging.)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Jan 2013 01:43:45 +0000 Ramona comment 172509 at http://dagblog.com Potential shame is a powerful http://dagblog.com/comment/172463#comment-172463 <a id="comment-172463"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172462#comment-172462">Yes. And the rest of us would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Potential shame is a powerful motivator.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:24:29 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 172463 at http://dagblog.com Yes. And the rest of us would http://dagblog.com/comment/172462#comment-172462 <a id="comment-172462"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172461#comment-172461">Happy New Year, Res. (But,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Yes. And the rest of us would point out the stupidity to you. Mr. Day would give you his daily dumb ass award. You would never live it down. LOL</div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:20:27 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 172462 at http://dagblog.com Happy New Year, Res. (But, http://dagblog.com/comment/172461#comment-172461 <a id="comment-172461"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172456#comment-172456">I&#039;d like the think that here</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Happy New Year, Res. (But, seriously... Mona would tell me.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:15:16 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 172461 at http://dagblog.com I'd like the think that here http://dagblog.com/comment/172456#comment-172456 <a id="comment-172456"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172453#comment-172453">My guess is that these guys</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>I'd like the think that here at Dag,</p> </blockquote> <p>Fuhgeddaboudit. I suspect they'll tell you once "You're a professional, you should know better"</p> <p>Me, I'd forgive you, because your a good addition to Dagblog.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:52:43 +0000 Resistance comment 172456 at http://dagblog.com Maybe Brooks is trying to get http://dagblog.com/comment/172457#comment-172457 <a id="comment-172457"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172454#comment-172454">On further thought, I&#039;m being</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe Brooks is trying to get people to ask, "Why not privatize"?</p> <p>He takes an absurd position in the hope, you'll analyze the situation, and come over to his deeply held position. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:31:53 +0000 Resistance comment 172457 at http://dagblog.com Brooks doesn't only pretend http://dagblog.com/comment/172455#comment-172455 <a id="comment-172455"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/172452#comment-172452">I would be embarrassed to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brooks doesn't only pretend to be stupid, he gets paid to teach others how to pretend to be stupid. Give him some credit for using what he's got.</p> <p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/the-10-most-pretentious-moments-in-history-readers-speak-out-20121226">http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/the-10-most-pretenti...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:24:34 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 172455 at http://dagblog.com On further thought, I'm being http://dagblog.com/comment/172454#comment-172454 <a id="comment-172454"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/still-cant-quit-brooks-15918">Still Can&#039;t Quit Brooks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On further thought, I'm being way too generous to Brooks with this calculation.</p> <p>For one thing, it's not inflation adjusted.  So, knock off 2% a year for a 4.5% annual return on this taxed money.</p> <p>But, even worse, the money isn't paid out all at once over 30 years.  The real return of around $210,000 is paid out, as needed over another 15-20 years after retirement.</p> <p>This is some very expensive "free" money.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:17:46 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 172454 at http://dagblog.com