dagblog - Comments for "Social Security&#039;s Haters (or, Payas Gonna Hate)." http://dagblog.com/politics/social-securitys-haters-or-payas-gonna-hate-16024 Comments for "Social Security's Haters (or, Payas Gonna Hate)." en Agreed. http://dagblog.com/comment/173496#comment-173496 <a id="comment-173496"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173490#comment-173490">It&#039;s kind of ruthless, isn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agreed.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:42:58 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 173496 at http://dagblog.com I know that, but believe it http://dagblog.com/comment/173494#comment-173494 <a id="comment-173494"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173488#comment-173488">That fable isn&#039;t about envy.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know that, but believe it or not, when shrub was in office and then again in the election of McCain and Obama,I received a lot more Emails.</p> <p>Suggesting that the (R) Ant worked so hard and saved, and the liberal ant, envied what the ant had accumulated.  </p> <p>"Save us Mr Ant, give us some shelter,  give us some food, you greedy dung beetle  or we'll just take it. Tax him for everything he has"</p> <p>That was the fear mongering by the right, keep Obama out of office, he'll tax you for everything you got.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:00:04 +0000 Resistance comment 173494 at http://dagblog.com It's kind of ruthless, isn't http://dagblog.com/comment/173490#comment-173490 <a id="comment-173490"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173489#comment-173489">Beyond just color, I&#039;m</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's kind of ruthless, isn't it? You're too old to be productive, so we shouldn't take care of you any more? I don't want to live in a place that thinks that way.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:34:01 +0000 Orlando comment 173490 at http://dagblog.com Beyond just color, I'm http://dagblog.com/comment/173489#comment-173489 <a id="comment-173489"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173486#comment-173486">I think what you say is more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Beyond just color, I'm intrigued by the notion that a retiree, after years of work has "left the economy," as Yglesias puts it.  I wonder if they would say the same thing about a startup entepreneur, movie star or professional athlete who makes enough money to retire at 30 or 40 and does so?  Have they "dropped out" of the economy?  Or just won the game?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:23:56 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 173489 at http://dagblog.com That fable isn't about envy. http://dagblog.com/comment/173488#comment-173488 <a id="comment-173488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173487#comment-173487">Green? But they&#039;ll say green</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That fable isn't about envy. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:22:33 +0000 Orlando comment 173488 at http://dagblog.com Green? But they'll say green http://dagblog.com/comment/173487#comment-173487 <a id="comment-173487"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173486#comment-173486">I think what you say is more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Green?</p> <p>But they'll say green with envy.</p> <p>They'll remind us of the Ant and the Grasshopper fable.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:04:58 +0000 Resistance comment 173487 at http://dagblog.com I think what you say is more http://dagblog.com/comment/173486#comment-173486 <a id="comment-173486"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173485#comment-173485">The old &quot;I&#039;ve got mine, now</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think what you say is more or less true, but my point was more that the people who complain about the system still take full advantage of the system. They just deem themselves worthy and others as unworthy. Guess what color worthy is.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:01:46 +0000 Orlando comment 173486 at http://dagblog.com The old "I've got mine, now http://dagblog.com/comment/173485#comment-173485 <a id="comment-173485"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173476#comment-173476">I think the key point here is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The old "I've got mine, now go get yours"</p> <p>The new , <span class="st"><strong>Go get yours</strong>." It is instead "<strong>I've got mine</strong> and <strong>now</strong> I am going to get yours and everyone else's, too. Deal with it." Can you say <strong>Halliburton (</strong><span style="font-size: 10px;">No bid contracts</span><strong>)? Romney?</strong></span></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:56:18 +0000 Resistance comment 173485 at http://dagblog.com I think the key point here is http://dagblog.com/comment/173476#comment-173476 <a id="comment-173476"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173414#comment-173414">The haters are welcome to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think the key point here is that, just like with other entitlement programs, people who support heavy cuts do not believe that they (or people in their families) are the "drain on the system." So, obviously, their parents and grandparents would be the "smart" ones and would be prepared financially for ruin, catastrophic illness, etc.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:03:49 +0000 Orlando comment 173476 at http://dagblog.com If only. I saw Carville a few http://dagblog.com/comment/173460#comment-173460 <a id="comment-173460"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/173414#comment-173414">The haters are welcome to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If only. I saw Carville a few years ago respond to a republican making that argument. he said, "Don't these people read history. A significant number of them didn't take care of their parents. So we had elderly living on the streets and in rat infested apartments eating out of dumpsters and eating cat food. Do we really want to go back to that?"</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:45:23 +0000 ocean-kat comment 173460 at http://dagblog.com