dagblog - Comments for "Does ex-CIA director share blame for 9/11?"

New evidence shows that the

erica20 — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:12:51 +0000

New evidence shows that the hijackers did go to that house after the family left but before 911--I posted the article in News. Please comment--I'm curious about the whole thing!

But a trial wouldn't have

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:36:02 +0000

In reply to ?Hell is empty and all the

But a trial wouldn't have told us that either - "just an accident". (though perhaps with 2013 sound forensics we might find traces on the tape)

?Hell is empty and all the

Resistance — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:05:53 +0000

In reply to In Nixon's case, was there

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here.”

In Nixon's case, was there anything we didn't really know?

I would have liked to have known, what was on the 18½ minute gap that President Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, “accidently erased”

I have all those treacherous

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:06:18 +0000

In reply to Unless someone can better

I have all those treacherous "asdfasdf" pages.

I don't think hijackers

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:56:15 +0000

In reply to Reading the article has me

I don't think hijackers showed up there - it was just suspect that they left the house a few days before 9/11 as if they ran to the store for milk. Later the FBI let them sell off the house without showing up for questioning.

The exodus of Saudis post-9/11 with no interviews was rather disturbing - while the rest of the country was going through shock & inconvenience, we had to keep our buds above the fray.

In Nixon's case, was there

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:50:26 +0000

In reply to I remember my grandmother

In Nixon's case, was there anything we didn't really know? I remember the summer of Watergate hearings - would it have helped the country to have 2 more? People actually went to jail in that scandal, Nixon's reputation never recovered despite his efforts.

Where we needed hearings was Iran-Contra, where Reagan's White House told the special prosecutor to fuck off, and Cap Weinberger lied to him with impunity. This success led directly to the Cheney years, when the Constitution became just an inconvenience, and Scooter Libby had all his chatty class Washington media buddies writing in to support his character and illegal activities.

Unless someone can better

Resistance — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:10:48 +0000

In reply to Does ex-CIA director share blame for 9/11?

Unless someone can better explain the meaning of the term sdsds?

I think it would be advisable to do a full security check on your computer systems.

These other site may have shut down the link, realizing the threat?

I remember my grandmother

Resistance — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:53:57 +0000

In reply to Resistance, I have to admit I

I remember my grandmother always saying "There is nothing hidden, which shall not be openly seen; nor anything secret, which shall not be known."

I believe, eventually the cover ups will be exposed, and we'll have another crisis of confidence in our government.

Another repeat of the conclusion of the Nixon Years. Where Ford pardoned Nixon for the good of the country? Yeah right, more like good for the Party? Or the powerful?

Wing nutty stuff doesn't

Erica — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:19:55 +0000

In reply to I got it now at this link,

Wing nutty stuff doesn't bother me. I admire their zeal, if not their boringly simplistic conclusions.

Reading the article has me

Erica — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:03:44 +0000

In reply to Does ex-CIA director share blame for 9/11?

Reading the article has me thinking about how the administration could not have taken seriously the warnings about al q, especially if they knew aq personnel were in the usa. Unless they thought, for whatever reason, that aq would not be a problem.

Which made me think about the long-standing ties between the bush fam and the Saudis. Perhaps the admin thought, possibly with some reassurance from saudi friends, that obl simply wouldn't screw over his own extended family by pulling off an attack on us soil, with a Saudi-friendly president in office and the promise of a pro-Saudi economic future for the ME.

except that Osama did. He screwed them all. Which is why bush was so shocked, and why the admin was initially so desperate to blame it all on the Iraqis, trying desperately to speed up the pnac plan to invade Iraq. But in the end there was nothing for it but to go into Afghanistan, and hey, maybe something good could come of it.....

i know it sounds like a conspiracy screenplay. But I like it.

also I just came across a 2001 article about a wealthy Saudi family who were living in a gated community in Sara sota. They left in a hurry a few days before 9/11, and after they left, their house was visited by none other than the soon-to-be highjackers. Will post tomorrow. Would that be news? Old news, if so.