dagblog - Comments for "Hillary Clinton takes those mugs on and wins! (So what&#039;s new?)" http://dagblog.com/politics/hillary-clinton-takes-those-mugs-and-wins-so-whats-new-16086 Comments for "Hillary Clinton takes those mugs on and wins! (So what's new?)" en I just wished to add one more http://dagblog.com/comment/173953#comment-173953 <a id="comment-173953"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/hillary-clinton-takes-those-mugs-and-wins-so-whats-new-16086">Hillary Clinton takes those mugs on and wins! (So what&#039;s new?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just wished to add one more note Ramona.</p> <p>I am watching Jon Stewart and he is making mince meat of these fiends who wish to defame Hillary.</p> <p>If nothing else, I am so damn mad...</p> <p>HILLARY FOR PREZ IN 2016!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:07:47 +0000 Richard Day comment 173953 at http://dagblog.com Senator Rand Paul said http://dagblog.com/comment/173914#comment-173914 <a id="comment-173914"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/hillary-clinton-takes-those-mugs-and-wins-so-whats-new-16086">Hillary Clinton takes those mugs on and wins! (So what&#039;s new?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Senator Rand Paul said Benghazi was the "<a href="http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/01/23/Benghazi-testimony-Rand-Paul-tells-Hillary-Clinton-I-would-have-relieved-you-of-your-post/9521358958312/">worst tragedy since 9/11"</a>.</p> <p>For those with memories longer than a 24 hour news cycle, the President and Vice-President of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/26/us/bush-to-limit-testimony-before-9-11-panel.html">Republican administration </a>in office on 9/11/2001:</p> <p>1) Initially <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/26/us/bush-to-limit-testimony-before-9-11-panel.html">opposed any investigation of the events of 9/11.</a></p> <p>2) When the investigation was planned over Republican administration objections, it was provided funding of <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,437267,00.html">$3 million. </a></p> <p>(3) <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/1999-04-01/politics/counsel.probe.costs_1_special-counsel-probe-david-m-barrett?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS">$80 million </a>was spent on the investigations of Bill Clinton, including the Monica Lewinsky affair, which resulted in the impeachment of Clinton by the Republican controlled House.</p> <p>4) Bush and Cheney placed extreme limits on their participation in the 9/11 investigation, demanding it be done in secret, limiting it to only 2 members of the Commission, restricting it to one hour, and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/29/bush.911.commission/">not allowing any recording or transcript of the session</a>.</p> <p>The GOP doesn't give a damn about 'keeping Americans safe', overseas, or in America.</p> <p>The nation is fortunate that people of the caliber of Ms. Clinton voluntarily serve in a government replete with these self-inflated blathering hypocrites.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:14:53 +0000 NCD comment 173914 at http://dagblog.com I just got back on line this http://dagblog.com/comment/173923#comment-173923 <a id="comment-173923"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/hillary-clinton-takes-those-mugs-and-wins-so-whats-new-16086">Hillary Clinton takes those mugs on and wins! (So what&#039;s new?)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just got back on line this week and I just saw a recording of Hillary at the hearings.</p> <p>AMAZING.</p> <p>One tough woman, not one tough bitch, one TOUGH FEMALE STATESMAN.</p> <p>One million and more emails sent to the State Department ADDRESSED TO ME!</p> <p>KUDOS TO CLINTON!</p> <p>WONDERFUL</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:03:17 +0000 Richard Day comment 173923 at http://dagblog.com