http://dagblog.com/link/perez-greenwald-16114 Comments for "Perez Greenwald" en http://dagblog.com/comment/174183#comment-174183 <a id="comment-174183"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/perez-greenwald-16114">Perez Greenwald</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It has always been hard for me to verbalize why I dislike most Greenwald columns. Chez's "insufferable sanctimony" is quite helpful in this regard; it's getting quite close. <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /> I find I've often had a reaction like this: "ya know, if I am honest with myself, I might agree with a lot of stuff he's writing here if it were written up differently, but I find myself wanting to disagree; why is that?"</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:01:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 174183 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/174179#comment-174179 <a id="comment-174179"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/perez-greenwald-16114">Perez Greenwald</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Almost as funny as Bush's jokes about WMD's.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:15:51 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 174179 at http://dagblog.com