dagblog - Comments for "A Glimmer of Hope?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glimmer-hope-16250 Comments for "A Glimmer of Hope?" en Listed in order of priority; http://dagblog.com/comment/174971#comment-174971 <a id="comment-174971"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glimmer-hope-16250">A Glimmer of Hope?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Listed in order of priority; definitely #6 then #5 because of #4</p> <blockquote> <p><em>believe that politicians who have always opposed the 2nd Amendment are<strong><u> using a national tragedy </u></strong>to push their anti-Second Amendment agenda.</em></p> </blockquote> <p>That's how our Nation was led to hate and fear the Japs; which led to their incarceration and confiscation of property. <strong>The fear mongers and their dupes deprived  </strong><strike>Japanese</strike>/<strong> American citizens of their rights.</strong></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:14:07 +0000 Resistance comment 174971 at http://dagblog.com Aren't they all still leading http://dagblog.com/comment/174969#comment-174969 <a id="comment-174969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glimmer-hope-16250">A Glimmer of Hope?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Aren't they all still leading answers?  Wouldn't it have been better to ask you what you thought in your own words?  I would choose #4 as well, but it's not really an answer.  What happens when, say, the majority of responders choose #4?  Does anything ever get done?</p> <p>Still, it's far better than most questionnaires, I'll give the new guy that.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:47:24 +0000 Ramona comment 174969 at http://dagblog.com It also did not include my http://dagblog.com/comment/174968#comment-174968 <a id="comment-174968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/174966#comment-174966">Emma, how does the cited</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It also did not include my own preference of mandatory military and firearms training for all citizens, "a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state" but I think the list does reflect the choices of that at least 80% of the population would find acceptable.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:36:30 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 174968 at http://dagblog.com Some of my previous http://dagblog.com/comment/174967#comment-174967 <a id="comment-174967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/174966#comment-174966">Emma, how does the cited</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Some of my previous Congressmen:  Newt Gingrich, John Linder, Tom Price.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:28:04 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 174967 at http://dagblog.com Emma, how does the cited http://dagblog.com/comment/174966#comment-174966 <a id="comment-174966"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/glimmer-hope-16250">A Glimmer of Hope?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Emma, how does the cited material cover the full range of opinion?</p> <p>How about:</p> <p>"Fuck the Second Amendment, children are dying"?</p> <p>or</p> <p>"OK, we have a Second Amendment problem, let's amend the constitution"</p> <p>or</p> <p>"Consistent with the Second Amendment, lets register all guns and ammunition buyers"</p> <p>I could go on, but you get my drift.</p> <p> </p> <p>Let me venture a wild stabbing guess:  You are represented by a Repugnant.  Sorry bout your luck...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:19:44 +0000 jollyroger comment 174966 at http://dagblog.com