dagblog - Comments for "PHIL DONAHUE &amp; THE IRAQ WAR" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/phil-donahue-iraq-war-16397 Comments for "PHIL DONAHUE & THE IRAQ WAR" en Pragmatism and greed. Let us http://dagblog.com/comment/176205#comment-176205 <a id="comment-176205"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176199#comment-176199">I thought you might</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pragmatism and greed.</p> <p>Let us prey!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:58:59 +0000 Richard Day comment 176205 at http://dagblog.com I thought you might http://dagblog.com/comment/176199#comment-176199 <a id="comment-176199"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/phil-donahue-iraq-war-16397">PHIL DONAHUE &amp; THE IRAQ WAR</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought you might appreciate <a href="http://xkcd.com/1191/">today's XKCD</a>:</p> <p><img alt="If history has taught us anything, we can use that information to destroy it." src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/the_past.png" style="width: 194px; height: 326px;" /></p> <p>(Title text: "If history has taught us anything, we can use that information to destroy it.")</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:41:23 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 176199 at http://dagblog.com thanks this is a very good http://dagblog.com/comment/176155#comment-176155 <a id="comment-176155"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176147#comment-176147">Here is another opinion by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thanks this is a very good link. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:59:50 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 176155 at http://dagblog.com There are lots of clips of http://dagblog.com/comment/176154#comment-176154 <a id="comment-176154"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176144#comment-176144">I cannot get Maher on HBO but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There are lots of clips of Maher on you tube if you don't mind waiting for a good laugh.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:58:12 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 176154 at http://dagblog.com Well I finished the http://dagblog.com/comment/176151#comment-176151 <a id="comment-176151"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176150#comment-176150">I am so excited about this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well I finished the  link.</p> <p>Thank you very much Lulu!</p> <p>Thank you.</p> <p>That is all I got!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:49:26 +0000 Richard Day comment 176151 at http://dagblog.com I am so excited about this http://dagblog.com/comment/176150#comment-176150 <a id="comment-176150"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176147#comment-176147">Here is another opinion by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am so excited about this link you just gave me that I had to reply prior to finishing the link for chrissakes.</p> <p>Mediamatters will spend hundreds of hours every damn week citing the sins of the right wing shenanigans? Is that a word?</p> <p>Who is paying you to be here?</p> <p>How much money do you make speaking at these 'educational promotions'?</p> <p>WHERE DO YOU GET YOUR DAMN MONEY ANYWAY?</p> <p>This is good.</p> <p>Thank you!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:40:01 +0000 Richard Day comment 176150 at http://dagblog.com Here is another opinion by http://dagblog.com/comment/176147#comment-176147 <a id="comment-176147"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/phil-donahue-iraq-war-16397">PHIL DONAHUE &amp; THE IRAQ WAR</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is another opinion by Chris Hedges.</p> <p><a href="http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/15309-the-day-that-tv-news-died">http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/15309-the-day-that-tv-news-died</a></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:12:25 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 176147 at http://dagblog.com I cannot get Maher on HBO but http://dagblog.com/comment/176144#comment-176144 <a id="comment-176144"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176128#comment-176128">We have a cable that plugs</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I cannot get Maher on HBO but I can catch his ten minute 'after' discussion with his panel and I can certainly pick up bits and pieces of the main attraction on HUFFPO and other sites.</p> <p>And you are right, you can catch Scarborough two hours later; at least you can 'fast through' the bull puckey. hahahahah</p> <p>Other shows might make you wait a day.</p> <p>I just finished watching the Bay Hill Competition on line thismorning. Of course the presentation is subpar in that they are forbid from showing to many holes where Tiger plays.</p> <p>I often sleep through some drama I like and within a day or two I usually can pick it up on the web.</p> <p>But Momoe, you are creative!</p> <p>Your slogan should be:</p> <p>I GET BY</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8y2RHMGqbWk" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:40:06 +0000 Richard Day comment 176144 at http://dagblog.com [yes, Saddam was a http://dagblog.com/comment/176132#comment-176132 <a id="comment-176132"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176131#comment-176131">These sentiments are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>[yes, Saddam was a hypothetical &amp; mystery; Hitler's army was much more on the roll, even without satellite imagery to confirm]</p> <p>Saddam was brought to the table without war, but it was likely the treat of war that did it. I still don't think a threat without Congressional resolution would have been effective.</p> <p>I also think we could have side-stepped the guerilla war - 3 days in Baghdad, put in the new leader, give an explicit description what will happen to him if he stops complying with the UN, and leave.</p> <p>But can debate these things forever.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:05:17 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 176132 at http://dagblog.com These sentiments are http://dagblog.com/comment/176131#comment-176131 <a id="comment-176131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/176126#comment-176126">I myself assumed Bush already</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  These sentiments are reasonable, possibly excepting the Godwin--Saddam wasn't invading anybody; his invading days were done.</p> <p>  In October,2002 , I didn't know that there weren't WMDs, and I didn't know what non-military option could have dealt with the problem. I still opposed the Congressional resolution, because I would rather have lived with a possible threat to human life rather than with an actual aggressive war which would cost many lives(before the invasion, I expected that there would be a long guerilla war).</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:29:14 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 176131 at http://dagblog.com