dagblog - Comments for "Adult consciousness may be present in infants&#039; minds, study says" http://dagblog.com/link/adult-consciousness-may-be-present-infants-minds-study-says-16575 Comments for "Adult consciousness may be present in infants' minds, study says" en We must have read different http://dagblog.com/comment/177143#comment-177143 <a id="comment-177143"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177114#comment-177114">When I first read this, the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We must have read different articles. They're saying adult consciousness traits start earlier than they thought with babies <em>but that is predicated on a strong belief that they do not have those traits before that, which not only means before birth but for several months after birth.</em></p> <blockquote> <p>The findings hint at an early shift from a largely passive biological process shared with other animals to the uniquely human ability to ponder ourselves and our surroundings in complex and abstract ways.</p> </blockquote> <p>That basically says that before this "early shift" happens, babies have little difference from animals. I think PETA might find more useful arguments here than anti-abortion folks. I.E., the youngest infants and animals are very alike, why do we protect the lives of them and not the others?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:31:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 177143 at http://dagblog.com When I first read this, the http://dagblog.com/comment/177114#comment-177114 <a id="comment-177114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177109#comment-177109">Huh? Since I don&#039;t know many</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When I first read this, the first thing I thought is that it might mean development as a whole occurs much earlier than we thought. That would hand one to the pro-lifers, yes?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:47:28 +0000 Orion comment 177114 at http://dagblog.com Huh? Since I don't know many http://dagblog.com/comment/177109#comment-177109 <a id="comment-177109"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177107#comment-177107">I know this comment is really</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Huh? Since I don't know many abortions taking place at 5 months postpartum, and the study <em>could </em>support arguments that fetuses have not reached full human potential, I <em>guess </em>one <em>could </em>say it's gives a point to the side of pro-choice. Which I happen to be on the side of, too. So no, the thought doesn't piss me off. On the other hand, I think I'd caution pro-choice people not to risk using it. Nobody likes puppy killers much, and puppies aren't fully developed dogs. More seriously, I really don't see this solving either side's "issues."</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:50:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 177109 at http://dagblog.com I know this comment is really http://dagblog.com/comment/177107#comment-177107 <a id="comment-177107"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/adult-consciousness-may-be-present-infants-minds-study-says-16575">Adult consciousness may be present in infants&#039; minds, study says</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know this comment is really going to piss you off, artappraiser, but doesn't that have a good deal of impact on the abortion debate?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:36:07 +0000 Orion comment 177107 at http://dagblog.com