dagblog - Comments for "Bush Right: Saddam had WMDs" http://dagblog.com/link/bush-right-saddam-had-wmds-16577 Comments for "Bush Right: Saddam had WMDs" en ....except for AR-15's. http://dagblog.com/comment/177161#comment-177161 <a id="comment-177161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177141#comment-177141">And Emma&#039;s point I think was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>....except for AR-15's.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:08:26 +0000 NCD comment 177161 at http://dagblog.com And Emma's point I think was http://dagblog.com/comment/177141#comment-177141 <a id="comment-177141"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177130#comment-177130">Why thank you so much for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And Emma's point I think was "No WMD left behind" ;-)</p> <p>Bell curve rules as a grading system.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:03:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 177141 at http://dagblog.com I agree. I don't think these http://dagblog.com/comment/177133#comment-177133 <a id="comment-177133"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bush-right-saddam-had-wmds-16577">Bush Right: Saddam had WMDs</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree. I don't think these weapons meet the WMD standard, and trying to say that they do, or that there's one international standard and one domestic standard unnecessarily complicates a case that will be most successful if kept simple.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:11:11 +0000 erica20 comment 177133 at http://dagblog.com Why thank you so much for http://dagblog.com/comment/177130#comment-177130 <a id="comment-177130"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177129#comment-177129">You may be missing PP&#039;s point</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why thank you so much for elucidating.  I never would have got that on my own.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:43:31 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 177130 at http://dagblog.com You may be missing PP's point http://dagblog.com/comment/177129#comment-177129 <a id="comment-177129"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177126#comment-177126">McVeigh would be even more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You may be missing PP's point as I take it.</p> <p>The WMD in this case were a pressure cooker, black powder explosive, nails and blasting cap. These items are available at many Wal-Marts.</p> <p>Ergo, if Bush found a pressure cooker in Iraq he could claim Saddam did, in fact, have WMD.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:31:34 +0000 NCD comment 177129 at http://dagblog.com McVeigh would be even more http://dagblog.com/comment/177126#comment-177126 <a id="comment-177126"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bush-right-saddam-had-wmds-16577">Bush Right: Saddam had WMDs</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>McVeigh would be even more po'd by a thread I saw a Facebook last night howling to try Tsarnaev for treason.  McVeigh very much wanted to be tried for treason but wasn't even though he killed and injured very many more in blowing up a <strong><em>federal </em></strong>building. I will never understand the urge to give that much recognition to plain murderers - mass or not.</p> <p>About how much in a mass, I read that in marketing it is appealing to the greater part of the bell curve of a population.  I guess that means omitting the tails which leaves 60-80%.  Should we apply the same metric to WMDs?  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:26:25 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 177126 at http://dagblog.com Would an explosive packed http://dagblog.com/comment/177123#comment-177123 <a id="comment-177123"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bush-right-saddam-had-wmds-16577">Bush Right: Saddam had WMDs</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Would an explosive packed Bushmaster AR-15 have avoided the terror charge?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:02:31 +0000 NCD comment 177123 at http://dagblog.com