dagblog - Comments for "A RANT ON TOMASKY, IMPEACHMENT &amp; THE REPUBS!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/rant-tomasky-impeachment-repubs-16682 Comments for "A RANT ON TOMASKY, IMPEACHMENT & THE REPUBS!" en NO, the model has not http://dagblog.com/comment/178021#comment-178021 <a id="comment-178021"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178015#comment-178015">So at best you want to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NO,  the model has not worked,  because eventually, all the parties are corrupted by the influence of money. Even you bemoan the fact that billionaires own the Tea Party..... I continually pray, for an overturning and replacement of the current status quo, when I say the Lords prayer.  "Let your Kingdom come" ..... The Tea party helps to remind and keep the two major capitalist parties, to never take the electorate for granted.  Eventually the Tea Party will become just as crooked and hopefully another uncorrupted party will succeed it, or my prayers will be answered first and we will no longer have to deal with corruptible men, adulterous politicians in bed with those with money, rather than serving the needs of the people who elected them..... Read the current <strong><u>"In the News",</u></strong> on the right side of the screen "<u><strong>Destroying the Labor Market</strong></u>" </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 20:39:46 +0000 Resistance comment 178021 at http://dagblog.com I have to say, ocean-kat does http://dagblog.com/comment/178022#comment-178022 <a id="comment-178022"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178019#comment-178019">Well you really know how to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have to say, ocean-kat does have a humorous side. That was funny and I have noticed he gets many a share of responses. So maybe we can all learn something from him after all. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 20:06:59 +0000 Resistance comment 178022 at http://dagblog.com Well you really know how to http://dagblog.com/comment/178019#comment-178019 <a id="comment-178019"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178016#comment-178016">I mean you get me more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well you really know how to make my day more upbeat.</p> <p>hahahahhaaha</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 19:09:17 +0000 Richard Day comment 178019 at http://dagblog.com I mean you get me more http://dagblog.com/comment/178016#comment-178016 <a id="comment-178016"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177986#comment-177986">What the hell am I going to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>I mean you get me more comments and hits than anything I write. hahahahahah</em></p> <p>Its the nature of dialog, especially internet dialog, that the better the post the less response it gets. The best writers here put up posts that are so comprehensive and well argued that the only room for response is a series of replies saying, "good post." Most simply don't post replies that only say "well done" or "I agree." Most people look for areas of disagreement.</p> <p>Even knowing this and trying to work against it I find myself falling into that pattern. Even my replies to those I respect the most here I find most often my replies are on the small areas of disagreement.</p> <p>If you're looking for more responses write sloppier posts with lots of errors. Don't support your arguments with facts. Say something extreme,  inflammatory or insulting that will get people here pissed off. As a general rule, the more ignorant and stupid your post, the more dialog you'll generate.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 18:36:30 +0000 ocean-kat comment 178016 at http://dagblog.com So at best you want to http://dagblog.com/comment/178015#comment-178015 <a id="comment-178015"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178013#comment-178013">Look closer and you&#039;ll see a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So at best you want to recycle the model of the political parties you dislike.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 18:15:57 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178015 at http://dagblog.com Look closer and you'll see a http://dagblog.com/comment/178013#comment-178013 <a id="comment-178013"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178010#comment-178010">I see a group propped up by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Look closer and you'll see a group who needs financial support to become a viable third party and others seeing the usefulness of this third party to gain power.... Much like the early Democratic Party, who saw the need to support Unions to get votes back then and now they ignore Labor, because they know the workers will now vote for them anyways, because where else can they go. because everyone knows; the Republicans are worse. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 15:59:42 +0000 Resistance comment 178013 at http://dagblog.com I see a group propped up by http://dagblog.com/comment/178010#comment-178010 <a id="comment-178010"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178004#comment-178004">I see a different Tea Party;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I see a group propped up by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/opinion/29rich.html?_r=0">billionaires</a>.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 13:58:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178010 at http://dagblog.com I see a different Tea Party; http://dagblog.com/comment/178004#comment-178004 <a id="comment-178004"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178000#comment-178000">I see the Tea Party as just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I see a different Tea Party; of people that see the need for Second Amendment Rights. ... I see members tying to end, the selling of Americans into servitude/slavery to the Chinese and others who buy our bonds, to support two unfunded wars and other financial sleight of hand tricks. All because our leaders, <strong>abuse the "good faith and credit of the United States"</strong>.  The bonds are backed by the promise;  America's leaders, will force the working class into slavery, if need be.... even allowing a sequester, in order to pay back the bonds? ....... Housing had to collapse as an investment tool, forcing folks into using the Financial brokers tools. You know who I'm talking about; the bedfellows of the Federal Reserve who get a very special arrangement.  The same brokers who would like to privatize our retirement.They know someday, the Chinese money might dry up or become more expensive.... The Tea Party appears to be crazy enough and brave enough  to overturn these  money changers tables.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 13:32:31 +0000 Resistance comment 178004 at http://dagblog.com "It is not in this countries http://dagblog.com/comment/178006#comment-178006 <a id="comment-178006"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/177996#comment-177996">Yes you do go over board</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>"It is not in this countries DNA"</em>   As I recall, the country elected George Bush for a second term.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 13:23:47 +0000 Resistance comment 178006 at http://dagblog.com I am trying to recall, maybe http://dagblog.com/comment/178002#comment-178002 <a id="comment-178002"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178000#comment-178000">I see the Tea Party as just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am trying to recall, maybe you know? ...... Was a Special master appointed during the GM /auto bailout? If so , what dictator appointed one or was it a mutually agreed arbitration...... Didn't the workers get the short end of the stick?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 17 May 2013 12:37:04 +0000 Resistance comment 178002 at http://dagblog.com