dagblog - Comments for " Criticism of Veterans Affairs Secretary Mounts Over Backlog in Claims" http://dagblog.com/link/criticism-veterans-affairs-secretary-mounts-over-backlog-claims-16719 Comments for " Criticism of Veterans Affairs Secretary Mounts Over Backlog in Claims" en Meanwhile: Accused Fort http://dagblog.com/comment/178153#comment-178153 <a id="comment-178153"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/criticism-veterans-affairs-secretary-mounts-over-backlog-claims-16719"> Criticism of Veterans Affairs Secretary Mounts Over Backlog in Claims</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Meanwhile:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.nbcdfw.com/investigations/Accused-Fort-Hood-Shooter-Paid-278000-While-Awaiting-Trial-208230691.html">Accused Fort Hood Shooter Paid $278,000 While Awaiting Trial</a><br /><em>Injured soldier outraged suspected shooter receives salary while his family financially struggles in recovery</em><br /> By Scott Friedman, <em>NBCFW</em>, May 21, 2013</p> <p id="paragraph1">The Department of Defense confirms to <strong><em>NBC 5 Investigates</em></strong> that accused Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan has now been paid more than $278,000 since the Nov. 5, 2009 shooting that left 13 dead 32 injured. The Army said under the Military Code of Justice, Hasan’s salary cannot be suspended unless he is proven guilty.</p> <p id="paragraph2">If Hasan had been a civilian defense department employee, <em><strong>NBC 5 Investigates</strong></em> has learned, the Army could have suspended his pay after just seven days.</p> <p id="paragraph3">Personnel rules for most civilian government workers allow for "indefinite suspensions" in cases "when the agency has reasonable cause to believe that the employee has committed a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed."</p> <p id="paragraph4">Meanwhile, more than three years later soldiers wounded in the mass shooting are fighting to receive the same pay and medical benefits given to those wounded in combat.</p> <p id="paragraph5">Retired Army Spc. Logan Burnett, a reservist who, in 2009, was soon to be deployed to Iraq, was shot three times when a gunman opened fire inside the Army Deployment Center.</p> <p id="paragraph6">“I honestly thought I was going to die in that building,” said Burnett. “Just blood everywhere and then the thought of -- that's my blood everywhere.”</p> <p id="paragraph7">Burnett nearly died. He's had more than a dozen surgeries since the shooting, and says post-traumatic stress still keeps him up at night.</p> <p id="paragraph8">Burnett is now fighting a new battle; only this one is against the U.S. Army.</p> <p id="paragraph9">The Army has not classified the wounds of the Ft. Hood victims as “combat related” and declines to label the shooting a “terrorist attack”,</p> <p id="paragraph10">The “combat related” designation is an important one, for without it Burnett and other shooting victims are not given combat-related pay, they are not eligible for Purple Heart retirement or medical benefits given to other soldiers wounded either at war or during the Sept. 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon.</p> <p id="paragraph11">As a result, Burnett, his wife Torey, and the families of other Fort Hood victims miss out on thousands of dollars of potential benefits and pay every year [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 May 2013 15:58:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 178153 at http://dagblog.com