dagblog - Comments for "A Word from Our Sponsor" http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733 Comments for "A Word from Our Sponsor" en I enjoy Bill Moyers and http://dagblog.com/comment/178252#comment-178252 <a id="comment-178252"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178236#comment-178236">All I got is that I grew up</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I enjoy Bill Moyers and always have.  I rewatch his shows on the internet.  I also am hooked on British period costume dramas.  I hope I get to see Citizen Koch and will pay to do so.  I hope the Koch brothers don't live as long as Pete Peterson. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2013 02:17:11 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 178252 at http://dagblog.com They are used to being http://dagblog.com/comment/178251#comment-178251 <a id="comment-178251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178242#comment-178242">I was able to listen to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They are used to being catered to and think they are owed it.  I think Ann Romney was a good example of that.  Fund raisers always kiss up to the rich.  To be truthfull I don't like to see David and Charles Koch in large letters before Nova and other shows on PBS.  All it does is reminds me of how much damage they are doing.  NPR has for the last several years moved to the right in order to keep the funding coming in. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:21 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 178251 at http://dagblog.com I was hoping Diane or the http://dagblog.com/comment/178250#comment-178250 <a id="comment-178250"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178248#comment-178248">Sure he didn&#039;t expect any</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was hoping Diane or the guest would note that claiming innocence and personal virtue by  recalling your supposedly noble lack of 'expectations' is total bullshit.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:28 +0000 NCD comment 178250 at http://dagblog.com Sure he didn't expect any http://dagblog.com/comment/178248#comment-178248 <a id="comment-178248"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178242#comment-178242">I was able to listen to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure he didn't expect any special treatment.  It's just that when the station aired a piece that, lo and behold, was (!) critical of him, making special treatment attempts surrounding the airing of the show to placate him out of concern that he might otherwise pull his funding, he... pulled his funding.</p> <p>So no, of course he didn't expect special treatment.  Given these facts as reported by Mayer, how could anyone think that?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 May 2013 01:44:08 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 178248 at http://dagblog.com I was able to listen to the http://dagblog.com/comment/178242#comment-178242 <a id="comment-178242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178226#comment-178226">From the article Shapiro</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was able to listen to the Diane Rehm show on the New Yorker article, and she read a statement from a Koch PR person saying Koch and/or Koch Inc <em>'didn't<strong> expect </strong>special treatment when they donated the money to PBS'</em>.</p> <p>Diane seemed to naively believe that proved innocence and high morals on their part. As if 'expecting special treatment' means jackshit when they in fact 'received special treatment'. Follow the money, the dollar rules in America.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 23:46:49 +0000 NCD comment 178242 at http://dagblog.com All I got is that I grew up http://dagblog.com/comment/178236#comment-178236 <a id="comment-178236"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733">A Word from Our Sponsor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>All I got is that I grew up with PBS; decades ago it was a local University channel.</p> <p>We still receive such fine educational docs as well as wonderful, wonderful series created mostly in GB. </p> <p>And BILL MOYERS IS BACK!</p> <p>Take that you Kocks!</p> <p>Bill Moyers is Back!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 22:58:58 +0000 Richard Day comment 178236 at http://dagblog.com From the article Shapiro http://dagblog.com/comment/178226#comment-178226 <a id="comment-178226"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733">A Word from Our Sponsor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From the article</p> <blockquote> Shapiro said that, in the end, he was comfortable with the journalistic standards of “Park Avenue,” and noted that he’d heard many positive comments from viewers, as well as negative ones. (The broadcast received high ratings for a PBS documentary.) But he said he felt blindsided by the Independent Television Service—the small arm of public television that funds and distributes independent films—for not giving him sufficient advance warning of the documentary’s contents.</blockquote> <p>And if ITVS had given Shapiro sufficient advance warning of the documentary's contents?  What would Shapiro have done differently?</p> <p>This is what happens when we have the degree of differences in wealth, and the extreme social and political inequality, we have in this country.  People who share the views and values of the Koch brothers are able to keep public funding of what is described as "public" TV to a minimum, partly to keep their taxes low, partly so they have opportunity to gain special privileges over its contents by giving a tiny pittance of their wealth to it.</p> <p>The sense of entitlement and arrogance is extraordinary.  How *dare* any media outlet that I fund portray me in a way that is critical!!  I own the damned ("public" TV!) station!!!  (And never mind that I haven't actually watched the film.  I don't need to, you see.)  It makes a mockery of the idea, which not a soul that I know can hear without laughing or shaking their head in dismay, that in what we like to tell ourselves is somehow a "democracy" beyond being a republic, outsized influence is not supposed to be purchasable.  Which, as one of its producers said, apparently is precisely the point of the movie.  </p> <p>A few people at the top have wildly disproportionate influence and are able to exempt themselves from any kind of accountability to their fellow citizens through an unrigged political system.  They believe, it appears, that the rest of us should simply bow down and kiss their feet.  They confuse deep resentment, anger, and moral revulsion towards them on the part of growing numbers of their fellow citizens with some sort of incomprehensible, and deeply ungrateful, hatred. </p> <p>To those who say they have no issue with a system that permits people to accumulate as much wealth as the Kochs or the Walton family or Gates, that the issue is solely one of too many people at the bottom not having necessities, and so what is the problem with those at the top end having what Koch and Walton and Gates have?--well, here is one of them.  Corrupted media and culture, beyond the corruption of the political system.  Yes, NYC PBS did air the film.  But look what else happened, that we know about, that is.  And how can instances such as this not have the effect going forward of self-censorship by NYC PBS or, as apparently has already happened, by ITVS--or else diminishing resources and commitment necessary to run a quality, independent network?</p> <p>Thanks for sharing.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 20:02:17 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 178226 at http://dagblog.com Koch and the GOP want to cut http://dagblog.com/comment/178225#comment-178225 <a id="comment-178225"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733">A Word from Our Sponsor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Koch and the GOP want to cut public funding of Public TV/Radio for the same reason they want to turn Social Security over to Wall Street. They want to own and control it all, including the lives of each and every 'moocher' in the county, meaning anyone not as rich as them</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 19:20:34 +0000 NCD comment 178225 at http://dagblog.com You may also want to go to http://dagblog.com/comment/178202#comment-178202 <a id="comment-178202"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733">A Word from Our Sponsor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You may also want to go to the "Citizen Koch" web site.  They plan to bring this film to the movie theaters.   <a href="http://www.citizenkoch.com/">http://www.citizenkoch.com/</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 07:25:17 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 178202 at http://dagblog.com Here is the trailer of http://dagblog.com/comment/178201#comment-178201 <a id="comment-178201"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/word-our-sponsor-16733">A Word from Our Sponsor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div class="media_embed" height="300px" width="400px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="300px" mozallowfullscreen="" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/66463890" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="400px"></iframe></div> <p>Here is the trailer of "Citizen Koch" about all the money that was spent in WI because of Citizen United.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 May 2013 07:14:47 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 178201 at http://dagblog.com