dagblog - Comments for "A Sensible Response to White Supremacy " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/sensible-response-white-supremacy-16780 Comments for "A Sensible Response to White Supremacy " en Thank you for respecting our http://dagblog.com/comment/178912#comment-178912 <a id="comment-178912"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178910#comment-178910">Understood. Thanks for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thank you for respecting our terms.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:29:24 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 178912 at http://dagblog.com Understood. Thanks for http://dagblog.com/comment/178910#comment-178910 <a id="comment-178910"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178909#comment-178909">Sorry, I missed that.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Understood. Thanks for clarifying.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:58:23 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178910 at http://dagblog.com Sorry, I missed that. http://dagblog.com/comment/178909#comment-178909 <a id="comment-178909"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178907#comment-178907">Just for my clarication, was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sorry, I missed that. Obviously, the moron comment crossed the line, and I have erased it.</p> <p>"Without honor" is mild but fits the pattern of personal snipes and provocations that you've both been engaging in. This a ToS warning to both you and Peracles.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:27 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 178909 at http://dagblog.com Just for my clarication, was http://dagblog.com/comment/178907#comment-178907 <a id="comment-178907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178906#comment-178906">Rmrd, please avoid ad</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just for my clarication, was it the without honr comment? I didn't think it was over the line after being called a moron. If  without honor crossed the line, then I apologize to Peracles.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:54:09 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178907 at http://dagblog.com Rmrd, please avoid ad http://dagblog.com/comment/178906#comment-178906 <a id="comment-178906"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178890#comment-178890">Back to yawning. You&#039;ve been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rmrd, please avoid ad hominems, thank you.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:34:07 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 178906 at http://dagblog.com So you have given up trying http://dagblog.com/comment/178904#comment-178904 <a id="comment-178904"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178901#comment-178901">TL;DR version: Obama Admin</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So you have given up trying to defend the ignorant Sarah Palin.  There are multiple posts dealing with the NSA and FISA. You have commented in any of those posts. Since you realize that Palin is a nitwit like Dan Qualye and Alvin Greene, and you can't use a gender- bias to reject the label of stupidity, you use a diversion.</p> <p>The protest has to include the amount of data we allow everyone from corporations to government to accumulate about us. Unfortunately in the Facebook era, privacy has been markedly diminished. When Facebook openly admitted how much information was being gathered, the protest should have begun. </p> <p>We can bet that China, North Korea, Russia and others are having a feast on our reasonable data without our knowledge. The protest cuts a much larger field than you imagine.</p> <p>Yes there should be pushback. Even with the protests, Sarah Palin remains a nitwit .As, I said before diversion is the only technique one can use in attempting to defend Palin's intellect.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:02:58 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178904 at http://dagblog.com TL;DR version: Obama Admin http://dagblog.com/comment/178901#comment-178901 <a id="comment-178901"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178894#comment-178894">You&#039;re still babbling.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>TL;DR version:</p> <p>Obama Admin running amok on civil liberties</p> <p>Sane people should be worried &amp; protesting</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:40:02 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 178901 at http://dagblog.com You're still babbling. http://dagblog.com/comment/178894#comment-178894 <a id="comment-178894"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178891#comment-178891">Sarah Palin has a college</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're still babbling. Interesting. Wish I had time to read it. Not.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:01:46 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178894 at http://dagblog.com The argument seems to suggest http://dagblog.com/comment/178893#comment-178893 <a id="comment-178893"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178889#comment-178889">Wattree, I grew up seeing the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The argument seems to suggest that there is no Black community without a White one in contrast. To be honest both groups care for family, friends and a peaceful existence. We can listen to different music, read different things, watch different things and happily co=exist.</p> <p>We will have different perceptions. Take the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/24/how-medea-benjamin-got-to-heckle-obama/">Medea Benjamin</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/politics/michelle-obama-confronts-heckler-at-fund-raiser.html?_r=0">Erica Sturz</a> episodes. Benjamin posted a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/06/hecklers-guide-power-protest">guide</a> for Michelle Obama to follow when confronted by hecklers. The Sturz episode can be viewed as speaking truth to power, but at another level it is a White woman yelling at a Black woman. Benjamin was a wide-eyed, open-mouthed White woman yelling at a Black President. Benjamin' s heckler guide is a White woman instructing a Black woman on how to behave. There is racial baggage. There was a strong negative <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/07/why-getequals-heckling-of-michelle-obama-backfired/">twitter</a> explosion among Black users.</p> <p>I don't expect White activists to stop getting in the face of the Obamas. I don't expect some Black activists or voters to view the confrontations as anything but White privilege. There will be disagreements. CodePink actually <a href="http://thisweekinblackness.com/2013/06/06/codeapology-codepink-apologizes-for-insensitivity-to-women-of-color/">apologized</a> for the actions of GetEQUAL. The sides will come together when there is a common interest.</p> <p>The sides are not obligated to agree but to discuss disagreements openly as equals.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:00:32 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 178893 at http://dagblog.com A single less-qualified (not http://dagblog.com/comment/178892#comment-178892 <a id="comment-178892"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/178890#comment-178890">Back to yawning. You&#039;ve been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A single less-qualified (not "unqualified") black man, and you think you have a point?</p> <p>Bring back Jesse Jackson for someone who could rouse a multicultural crowd and maintain a humane perspective. Bet Jackson wouldn't go for unrestricted drones and handing over all call records.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:27:16 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 178892 at http://dagblog.com