dagblog - Comments for "Cool or creepy: microgrids? Let&#039;s vote!" http://dagblog.com/link/cool-or-creepy-microgrids-lets-vote-16841 Comments for "Cool or creepy: microgrids? Let's vote!" en I remember reading a CBO http://dagblog.com/comment/179105#comment-179105 <a id="comment-179105"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/cool-or-creepy-microgrids-lets-vote-16841">Cool or creepy: microgrids? Let&#039;s vote!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I remember reading a CBO report over a decade making a case for what they called a distributed grid and at least one of their arguments was defense related.  The main idea was that power could be rerouted to non-damaged areas more easily whatever the cause of the outage whether war, terror, natural disasters or Enron.</p> <p>Around the same time companies with sites in California like FedEx that absolutely positively have to stay operational began installing a lot of solar panels on their roofs.</p> <p>It was a good idea then and still is.  Walmart even thinks so. I recently read that it is planning to make their stores able to operate independent of any grid.</p> <p>Since I have personal aspirations of being my own microgrid (cloud, too!) I vote in favor. </p> <p>Now if we can just pry the needed infrastructure rights of way from the grasping hands of the utility dinosaurs.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:04:10 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 179105 at http://dagblog.com