dagblog - Comments for "Better Gun Control" http://dagblog.com/politics/better-gun-control-16920 Comments for "Better Gun Control" en I believe consumers union http://dagblog.com/comment/180105#comment-180105 <a id="comment-180105"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179974#comment-179974">I would guess that what will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I believe consumers union recommends when on a zombie search and destroy mission that you pack nothing with less stopping power than a desert eagle or a 357 mag minimum. Too bad for me and my puny <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/when-cecil-wlliams-preaches-warren-buffett-listens-and-so-do-i-14125">chief's special </a></div></div></div> Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:52:21 +0000 jollyroger comment 180105 at http://dagblog.com If the government is the http://dagblog.com/comment/180052#comment-180052 <a id="comment-180052"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179928#comment-179928">I guess that I have an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If the government is the plaintiff, the government can choose not to sue, and will always face political pressure not to.</p> <p>If private parties are the plaintiff, they have a right to pursue their case. That's the one advantage I see to tort.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:37:44 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 180052 at http://dagblog.com Well, guns make their way http://dagblog.com/comment/180037#comment-180037 <a id="comment-180037"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180036#comment-180036">Inner city violence between</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, guns make their way into the poorest hands in the world, so I won't hold my breath.</p> <p>I haven't seen them all, but in many films, guns do work against zombies, though fire is better. In <em>Shaun of the Dead</em>, you could dispatch them with a cricket bat.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:34:22 +0000 Donal comment 180037 at http://dagblog.com Inner city violence between http://dagblog.com/comment/180036#comment-180036 <a id="comment-180036"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179974#comment-179974">I would guess that what will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Inner city violence between young males is one of the largest and most tragic sources of gun homicide. Except for a few drug kingpins, these kids certainly aren't rich. If fewer of them can afford guns, that in itself would go a long way towards reducing gun violence.</p> <p>PS Guns don't work against zombies</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:15:10 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 180036 at http://dagblog.com I would guess that what will http://dagblog.com/comment/179974#comment-179974 <a id="comment-179974"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179958#comment-179958">Ha. There are 114 gun</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would guess that what will happen with either taxing or insuring firearms, is that buying/owning the cheaper models will become too expensive to be practical. Why buy a Raven if it costs as much as a Ruger?</p> <p>Drug dealers will still buy pretty guns, but less profitable criminals will have to turn to secondhand or stolen or fenced firearms made by better manufacturers. Then the better manufacturer's models will also be taxed/insured at a higher rate, and purchasing any firearm will cost that much more.</p> <p>So eventually owning firearms will be a rich man's game. And when we start turning into zombies, only the rich will survive.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:41:28 +0000 Donal comment 179974 at http://dagblog.com It's impossible to eliminate http://dagblog.com/comment/179961#comment-179961 <a id="comment-179961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179931#comment-179931">Just noted on posting a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's impossible to eliminate every assault weapon in the country, but I think it's a reasonable goal to raise barriers so that there are far fewer of them.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:23:04 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 179961 at http://dagblog.com I agree, it's a disgrace. And http://dagblog.com/comment/179959#comment-179959 <a id="comment-179959"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179949#comment-179949">I am all for booting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree, it's a disgrace. And I support alternative approaches that the states are doing.</p> <p>I just don't think that we'll ever defeat the NRA legislators by compromising with them to pass whatever measly restrictions they're willing to permit. And I don't think we'll ever have serious gun control until we defeat them.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:19:55 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 179959 at http://dagblog.com Ha. There are 114 gun http://dagblog.com/comment/179958#comment-179958 <a id="comment-179958"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179940#comment-179940">If you tax guns, only tax</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ha. There are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Firearms_manufacturers_in_the_United_States">114</a> gun manufacturers in the United States. I think the IRS is up to the task.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:14:35 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 179958 at http://dagblog.com I am all for booting http://dagblog.com/comment/179949#comment-179949 <a id="comment-179949"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179925#comment-179925">I&#039;m more interested in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am all for booting Republicans out of government, then cull through the Democrats for the DINO.</p> <p>The new NY laws on guns are tough, and California has some new ideas on requiring a <a href="http://www.kqed.org/news/story/2013/05/29/121461/gun_control_package_passes_california_senate">license and maintaining a database on ammunition </a>purchases. You can't pussyfoot around with gun manufacturers.</p> <p>The GOP uses the law to de-regulate gun carry and stymie sensible gun laws, the reason is they know the law, not disincentives, rules the land, and use of the law, at state or federal level, is the only route to sane control of guns.</p> <p>Don't you find it shocking that for every gun sold in the country, doing the math, there is a $10,000 dollar hit to the economy in death/medical care/work loss from guns nationwide? It's a disgrace.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:23:17 +0000 NCD comment 179949 at http://dagblog.com If you tax guns, only tax http://dagblog.com/comment/179940#comment-179940 <a id="comment-179940"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/179928#comment-179928">I guess that I have an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you tax guns, only tax evaders will have guns.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:26:03 +0000 Donal comment 179940 at http://dagblog.com