dagblog - Comments for "Snowden, Prism, and Us - Food for Thought" http://dagblog.com/politics/snowden-prism-and-us-food-thought-16972 Comments for "Snowden, Prism, and Us - Food for Thought" en Wow I meant to say defectors http://dagblog.com/comment/180661#comment-180661 <a id="comment-180661"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180656#comment-180656">As I think I mentioned on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow I meant to say defectors not factors. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 23:01:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180661 at http://dagblog.com As I think I mentioned on http://dagblog.com/comment/180656#comment-180656 <a id="comment-180656"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180646#comment-180646">The mental health of many</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As I think I mentioned on another thread, I've always wondered if that is something about the Russian culture. Expats, whether during the Soviet era or before or after, just don't seem to fare well there.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:29:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 180656 at http://dagblog.com good to know someone else is http://dagblog.com/comment/180655#comment-180655 <a id="comment-180655"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180644#comment-180644">Thanks for this and your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>good to know someone else is looking at my Egypt news updates....</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:27:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 180655 at http://dagblog.com The mental health of many http://dagblog.com/comment/180646#comment-180646 <a id="comment-180646"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/snowden-prism-and-us-food-thought-16972">Snowden, Prism, and Us - Food for Thought</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/02/edward-snowden-risks-sharing-fate-of-kim-philby-guy-burgess-more.html">mental health</a> of many factors has suffered</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:27:24 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180646 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for this and your http://dagblog.com/comment/180644#comment-180644 <a id="comment-180644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180640#comment-180640">Excellent point: Why Won?t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for this and your posts on Egypt.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:04:36 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180644 at http://dagblog.com Excellent point: Why Won?t http://dagblog.com/comment/180640#comment-180640 <a id="comment-180640"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/snowden-prism-and-us-food-thought-16972">Snowden, Prism, and Us - Food for Thought</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excellent point:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/07/edward_snowden_and_asylum_he_is_a_terrible_candidate.html">Why Won’t Anyone Take Edward Snowden?</a><br /> Because he is a terrible candidate for asylum.<br /> By Eric Posner, <em>Slate,</em> July 3, 2013</p> <p>[....] Snowden could be regarded as a political dissenter, but the United States is attempting to arrest him not because he holds dissenting views, but because he violated the law by disclosing information that he had sworn to keep secret. <strong>All countries have such laws; they could hardly grant asylum to an American for committing acts that they themselves would regard as crimes if committed by their own nationals </strong>[....]</p> </blockquote> <p>I would think it is less about pressure from the U.S. than it is this, that after investigating his story and thinking a minute, seeing someone who could just become a big thorn in your side. He would be an example their own "troublemakers" could point to, i.e., "you supported him, why not me, your own citizen 'whistleblower'"?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:23:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 180640 at http://dagblog.com You have zero credibility. http://dagblog.com/comment/180635#comment-180635 <a id="comment-180635"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180632#comment-180632">Uh, he says &quot;journalists&quot;,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You have zero credibility. You wrongly attacked me. Now you whine. Get over it. Time for me to enjoy the day.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:35:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180635 at http://dagblog.com Uh, he says "journalists", http://dagblog.com/comment/180632#comment-180632 <a id="comment-180632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180630#comment-180630">Response to PP above. Here is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Uh, he says "journalists", i.e. informing media, not governments. Subtle difference.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:59:18 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 180632 at http://dagblog.com Response to PP above. Here is http://dagblog.com/comment/180630#comment-180630 <a id="comment-180630"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/snowden-prism-and-us-food-thought-16972">Snowden, Prism, and Us - Food for Thought</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Response to PP above. Here is an example of how discussions about lying have gone</p> <p>The attack because of lack of knowledge of the OWS surveillance. Is just one example. There is a reflex charge of lying. Here is one exchange.</p> <p> </p> <blockquote> <div> China made the decision that Snowden could leave Hong Kong.</div> <div> by rmrd0000 6/25/2013 - 6:58 am (re: rmrd0000) edit reply delete</div> <div> Snowden seems to have taken the job to release NSA dpmestic spying info to US citizens.</div> <div>  </div> <div> You're intentionally overplaying every "fact" you come across.</div> <div> Is that how you typically win arguments?</div> <div> by PeraclesPlease 6/25/2013 - 8:17 am (re: rmrd0000) reply</div> <div> From Snowden's interview with the South China Morning Post</div> <div>  </div> <div> "If I have time to go through this information, I would like to make it available to journalists in each country to make their own assessment, independent of my bias, as to whether or not the knowledge of US network operations against their people should be published."</div> <div>  </div> <div> Snowden does not say that he is informing US citizens, he is informing foreign governments.</div> <div> by rmrd0000 6/25/2013 - 8:44 am (re: PeraclesPlease) reply delete</div> </blockquote> <p> </p> <div>  I was said to be misstating facts, when I was quoting Snowden's statement.. I'll post more examples. Being called a liar by PP carries little impact.</div> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:31:33 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180630 at http://dagblog.com As I told Ramona, she forgot http://dagblog.com/comment/180629#comment-180629 <a id="comment-180629"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/180627#comment-180627">Lying about what I say is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As I told Ramona, she forgot to play by your rules.</p> <p>By your rules,  only you are allowed to be offended. It is ridiculous. Bring up Burma again when we are discussing US law, then complain about someone going off topic. Hey today is the 150th anniversary of Pickett's charge at <a href="http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/civil-war/2013/jul/3/gettysburg-commemorates-150-year-anniversary-july-/">Gettysburg</a> and the retreat of the Confederates.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 03 Jul 2013 15:55:56 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 180629 at http://dagblog.com