http://dagblog.com/link/leak-shows-drone-deaths-17105 Comments for "Leak shows drone deaths" en http://dagblog.com/comment/181766#comment-181766 <a id="comment-181766"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/181764#comment-181764">400 is quite conservative.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, thought so too - but it's a fairly official Pakistani number, and still much higher than Brennan's 60 or whatever. Also looks like the Pakistanis low-balled deaths once Obama came in, I guess to improve relations. Wonder how that's working out for them.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:12:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 181766 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/181764#comment-181764 <a id="comment-181764"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/leak-shows-drone-deaths-17105">Leak shows drone deaths</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  400 is quite conservative. The Bureau for Investigative Journalism put the minimum number of civilian dead at 441; their maximum was close to 900. And that tally was done last year.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:25:18 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 181764 at http://dagblog.com