dagblog - Comments for "The Assassination of Julian Assange" http://dagblog.com/link/assassination-julian-assange-17155 Comments for "The Assassination of Julian Assange" en Why doesn't Assange go back http://dagblog.com/comment/182151#comment-182151 <a id="comment-182151"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/assassination-julian-assange-17155">The Assassination of Julian Assange</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why doesn't Assange go back to Sweden to fight the charges?</p> <p>Don't they have an Ecuadorian embassy there (if necessary)?</p> <p>I already believed Assange was secretive, manipulative, dishonest and vain and I never watched the Gibney video, or conjectured on the the quality of Assange's Swedish condoms.</p> <p>Tomorrow we find out what price Manning pays for giving 700,000 documents to this vain and manipulative man tomorrow.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Jul 2013 01:09:29 +0000 NCD comment 182151 at http://dagblog.com They succeeded even if they http://dagblog.com/comment/182114#comment-182114 <a id="comment-182114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182112#comment-182112">I don&#039;t agree that the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They succeeded even if they haven't triumphed (yet or ever)</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:00:23 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 182114 at http://dagblog.com I don't agree that the http://dagblog.com/comment/182112#comment-182112 <a id="comment-182112"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182109#comment-182109">Yeah, he&#039;s so secret everyone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't agree that the whistle blowers have succeeded yet. Public opinion has moved a few points on a few issues and the yellow ribbon industry has suffered a bit, but not enough to change anything. Clapper, for instance, has been shown lieing under oath to Congress and the world and he still has his job.  This comment is being intercepted and stored along with all others and all phone calls. More than half of all elected representatives voted to keep it that way. Some people in positions to know but bound by secrecy oaths say there is worse going on than that. War crimes continue to create new enemies daily. Even among those who object and think the government has gone too far, many, if not the majority, think the whistle blowers should go to jail for harshing our mellow by revealing it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:31:12 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 182112 at http://dagblog.com I don't know that Assange's http://dagblog.com/comment/182110#comment-182110 <a id="comment-182110"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182109#comment-182109">Yeah, he&#039;s so secret everyone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't know that Assange's true nature is, but I see nothing unusual in the concept that you have someone revealing everyone else's secrets who has secrets of their own to hide. Indeed that story is quite an old one.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:55:43 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 182110 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, he's so secret everyone http://dagblog.com/comment/182109#comment-182109 <a id="comment-182109"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182108#comment-182108">The film?s contention is that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, he's so secret everyone keeps telling him to shut up. And look at all that power.</p> <p>I guess it would have been okay if all they did was publish Scientology texts to laugh at. I think it funny when someone holds up Domscheit-Berg as a dissident of proof without noticing that Daniel never actually did anything after he left Wikileaks.</p> <p>Anyway, despite attempts by people to shoot the messenger, any public enthusiasm about Iraq/Afghanistan is now pretty deflated, Bradley Manning's a household name with our actions in Iraq well-publicized, and Snowden's got everyone talking about actual mass snooping - whether we do something about it or not. So they succeeded - everything else is just quibbling or gossiping like some fan magazine.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:43:34 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 182109 at http://dagblog.com The film?s contention is that http://dagblog.com/comment/182108#comment-182108 <a id="comment-182108"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/assassination-julian-assange-17155">The Assassination of Julian Assange</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">The film’s contention is that Assange is a natural-born egotist and, however noble his initial project, Wikileaks ended up not only feeding his vanity but also accentuating in him the very qualities — secretiveness, manipulativeness, dishonesty and a hunger for power — he so despises in the global forces he has taken on.</span></p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:14:12 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 182108 at http://dagblog.com