dagblog - Comments for "The link between Wall Street and Main Street is shattered. It&#039;s time to confront what that means." http://dagblog.com/link/link-between-wall-street-and-main-street-shattered-its-time-confront-what-means-17185 Comments for "The link between Wall Street and Main Street is shattered. It's time to confront what that means." en Nice essay. He is right about http://dagblog.com/comment/182376#comment-182376 <a id="comment-182376"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/link-between-wall-street-and-main-street-shattered-its-time-confront-what-means-17185">The link between Wall Street and Main Street is shattered. It&#039;s time to confront what that means.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice essay.</p> <p>He is right about the extreme solutions on offer and how difficult it is to even discuss possible alternatives.</p> <p>A possible alternative I would like to see opened for discussion is how to turn what we should have learned from the financialization of our economy to broader public advantage. Things like sovereign wealth funds to generate government revenues instead of taxes. We should treat subsidies and venture capital grants to industry as equity or debt interest in those enterprises and should expect returns on them same as any private investor would; we should charge a miniscule transaction fee on every single economic transaction just like bankers do now; and as insurer of last resort, we really should be receiving rather than paying premiums. </p> <p>These and many more possibilities are income-producing services the private sector uses to amass great wealth for a few. Why not rechannel some of it to the general welfare through GSEs with specific purposes (like TVA). An added advantage would be that they could be used to set industry benchmarks that the private sector would have to meet or exceed to compete and greatly reduce the need for private sector regulation.</p> <p>The income from these and other goods and services should be designed to produce enough income (hopefully) to assure a basic living standard for every <strong><em>citizen.</em></strong></p> <p>People who <strong><em>need</em></strong> jobs need them because they have no other income. Change that and change the world.  Not to worry, I expect people will still want and need work for a variety of reasons. Basic survival should not be one of them in a sane society.</p> <p>Tired now.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 16:13:37 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 182376 at http://dagblog.com It shattered a long time ago. http://dagblog.com/comment/182371#comment-182371 <a id="comment-182371"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/link-between-wall-street-and-main-street-shattered-its-time-confront-what-means-17185">The link between Wall Street and Main Street is shattered. It&#039;s time to confront what that means.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It shattered a long time ago. See <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Predator-Nation-Corporate-Criminals-Corruption/dp/0307952568/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1375499635&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=predator+naTION">Predator Nation</a> by Charles Ferguson. Wall Street not only makes money whether stocks go up or down, Ferguson relates how they control the economics profession in the US.  Testifying or writing papers criticizing them or their operations can literally end your career in economics because so many big shots in the field are on the take.</p> <p>After Ferguson's movie <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Inside-Job/dp/B004NOCCEG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1375500535&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=inside+job">'Inside Job' </a>on the 2008 meltdown, some universities like Columbia initiated the requirement for professors to list who they get money from when 'offf duty' from teaching, although the amounts paid are not listed.</p> <p>Most other universities, like Harvard, have no such requirement.</p> <p>These are the same economists who Congress calls in for testimony on whether more regulations, or raising taxes on Wall Street bonuses would be 'good' for the economy. Wall Street has everyone on payola,  from government to academia. And the suckers on Main Street get the bill.</p> <p>Columbia's Business School Dean,<a href="http://www1.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/4572/Hubbard%20Curriculum%20Vitae%20-%20complete%20%282%29.pdf"> R. Glenn Hubbard</a>, for instance lists 'other work' for:</p> <p>Arcapita<br /> Nomura Holdings America<br /> Laurus Funds<br /> Chart Venture Partners<br /> Ripplewood Holdings<br /><br /> Consulting or Speaking Engagements at<br /> Some Point During the Past Five Years:<br /><br /> U.S. Department of Justice</p> <p>Airgas,<br /> Alternative Investment Group,<br /> American Century,<br /> America’s Health Insurance Plans,<br /> Apex Brasil,<br /> Association for Corporate Growth,<br /> Bank of America,<br /> Bank of New York Mellon,<br /> Barclays Services Corporation,<br /> BGC,<br /> BNP<br /> Paribas,<br /> Capital Research, Citigroup,<br /> Compagnie Financiere Tradition,<br /> Credit Suisse,<br /> Deutsche Bank,<br /> Fidelity, Franklin Resources,<br /> Freddie Mac, Goldman Sachs,<br /> Intel, JP<br /> Morgan Chase,</p> <p>Microsoft,<br /> National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation,<br /> NMS Group,<br /> Oracle,<br /> Pension Real Estate Association,<br /> Real Estate Roundtable,<br /> Reynolds American,<br /> Royal Bank of Scotland,<br /> Visa<br /> Wells Fargo<br /> _________________________________</p> <p>Main Street ain't on the list.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 03:39:30 +0000 NCD comment 182371 at http://dagblog.com