dagblog - Comments for "Jerks For Cads (Rattner Prefers Summers)" http://dagblog.com/politics/jerks-cads-rattner-prefers-summers-17187 Comments for "Jerks For Cads (Rattner Prefers Summers)" en That was an amazing catch -- http://dagblog.com/comment/182384#comment-182384 <a id="comment-182384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182382#comment-182382">Girls suck at sports too.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That was an amazing catch -- for anyone.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 21:07:47 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 182384 at http://dagblog.com Tuning into the debate what I http://dagblog.com/comment/182383#comment-182383 <a id="comment-182383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/jerks-cads-rattner-prefers-summers-17187">Jerks For Cads (Rattner Prefers Summers)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Tuning into the debate what I am hearing is that Yellen has expressed behavior that recommends her and Summers had definitely expressed behavior that has people arguing against him.  Perhaps they are equally qualified to some degree but so far it sounds like Yellen is better qualified at maintaining balance while Summers has a reputation of being all for Wall Street.    Senator Warren is endorsing Yellen as a pick over Summers which again lends the idea that Yellen is more balanced. </p> <p>It doesn't make sense to me at all that Summers be appointed.  A Fed Chair must be very measured in everything they say to the public and Summers has demonstrated that he is not capable of that.  Passing over Yellen makes no sense at all to me. </p> <p>I would have to agree that his appointment would be evidence of the elevation of the 'dick' club.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 20:49:25 +0000 synchronicity comment 182383 at http://dagblog.com Girls suck at sports too. http://dagblog.com/comment/182382#comment-182382 <a id="comment-182382"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182379#comment-182379">&quot;Summers casually dismissed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Girls suck at sports too.</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="640px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4SqJz0NgnnE?feature=player_detailpage" width="640px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 20:40:56 +0000 ocean-kat comment 182382 at http://dagblog.com In some ways (not nearly http://dagblog.com/comment/182380#comment-182380 <a id="comment-182380"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182378#comment-182378">Funny how &quot;not likeable&quot; and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In some ways (not nearly enough, IMO) the rewards for dickish behavior have eroded as society has evolved.  Don Draper in 2013 is more a liability than an asset. Rather than adapt, some people (men and women) have circled the wagons around the old ways.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 16:27:16 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 182380 at http://dagblog.com "Summers casually dismissed http://dagblog.com/comment/182379#comment-182379 <a id="comment-182379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/jerks-cads-rattner-prefers-summers-17187">Jerks For Cads (Rattner Prefers Summers)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 17px;">"</span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 17px;">Summers casually dismissed the scientific and mathematical abilities of an entire gender at Harvard. </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 17px;">" </span></em><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 17px;">reminded me of this:</span></p> <p><img alt="" src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/how_it_works.png" style="width: 410px; height: 211px;" /></p> <p>As of Summers v. Yellen, I wonder who Goldman wants because <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/02/the-legal-jujitsu-of-goldman-sachs/">Goldman tends to get what it wants</a>.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 16:24:45 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 182379 at http://dagblog.com Funny how "not likeable" and http://dagblog.com/comment/182378#comment-182378 <a id="comment-182378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/jerks-cads-rattner-prefers-summers-17187">Jerks For Cads (Rattner Prefers Summers)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Funny how "not likeable" and "coworkers say she's abrasive" never works the same way for prominent women appointees (for example, see the conversation around Sonia Sotomayor's appointment in 2009 to the SC).  You have to admire the brazenness of the jujitsu move, here, though:  "yes, Larry Summers is a dick, but that's a HUGE ADVANTAGE!"</p> <p>But maybe it's not so surprising that dicks like to stand up for dickish behavior &amp; want to see it rewarded.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 16:19:42 +0000 Historiann comment 182378 at http://dagblog.com