dagblog - Comments for "The NSA Read Your Emails and All You Got Was This Lousy Fake Terrorism Prosecution" http://dagblog.com/politics/nsa-read-your-emails-and-all-you-got-was-lousy-fake-terrorism-prosecution-17228 Comments for "The NSA Read Your Emails and All You Got Was This Lousy Fake Terrorism Prosecution" en We've been watching for a http://dagblog.com/comment/182834#comment-182834 <a id="comment-182834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182597#comment-182597">because it makes us all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We've been watching for a long time now, you know?</p> <p>God bless America!</p> <p>--W</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:17:25 +0000 The Decider comment 182834 at http://dagblog.com because it makes us all http://dagblog.com/comment/182597#comment-182597 <a id="comment-182597"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182568#comment-182568">Basaaly Moalin is nothing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">because it makes us all "safe". </span></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">Far from it; next thing you know;, anyone that shows sympathy or support for a B. Moalin will be charged with aiding and abetting the enemy? . I suppose you and I will now be monitored?  </span></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 12 Aug 2013 04:59:19 +0000 Resistance comment 182597 at http://dagblog.com There's a fine line between http://dagblog.com/comment/182589#comment-182589 <a id="comment-182589"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182558#comment-182558">The worst aspect is the sheer</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There's a fine line between "probably up to no good" and "he needed killin'." Obviously, it's a line the people commanding the drones don't really worry about. When I used Anwar al-Awlaki's extrajudicial execution as an example, I wasn't aware of the more glaring case of his teenage grandson. So the Trayvon Martin comparison didn't come to mind:<br /><br /> <a href="http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/18064-up-to-no-good-the-racial-profiling-of-trayvon-martin-abdulrahman-awlaki">http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/18064-up-to-no-good-the-racial-profili...</a><br /><br /> But it is totally valid. The reason the U.S. Constitution banned bills of attainder was that they had been used, during succession struggles back in England, by Catholics to demonize and marginalize Protestants, and by Protestants to do the same to Catholics. Membership in an identifiable group was arbitrarily deemed criminal. The Founding Fathers recognized profiling and denial of due process went hand in hand, and were determined to stamp both out. Nice try, guys.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:52:18 +0000 acanuck comment 182589 at http://dagblog.com Basaaly Moalin is nothing http://dagblog.com/comment/182568#comment-182568 <a id="comment-182568"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/nsa-read-your-emails-and-all-you-got-was-lousy-fake-terrorism-prosecution-17228">The NSA Read Your Emails and All You Got Was This Lousy Fake Terrorism Prosecution</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Basaaly Moalin is nothing more than a scapegoat being used to "show" the american public that NSA spying is worth the loss of individual freedoms becuase it makes us all "safe".</p> <p> </p> <p>He's not an American and his actions were directed to some far and distant land and issues, so it's easy to fabricate a "what if" scenario that gullible people will swallow hook, line and sinker and feel at home with sacrificing our individual freedoms so we all  can "feel' safe.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:06:42 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 182568 at http://dagblog.com They can run algorithms on a http://dagblog.com/comment/182561#comment-182561 <a id="comment-182561"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182558#comment-182558">The worst aspect is the sheer</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They can run algorithms on a quadrillion emails and phone numbers, and arrest a guy sending money to Somalia.  They call that keeping us safe.</p> <p>The government can't write a simple rule for parking and securing a train loaded with explosive petrochemicals on a hill. A hill that may have 50 happy Canucks at the bottom of it, folks who don't know their quaint little village is about to be blown off the map.</p> <p>That's national security 9/11 style.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 10 Aug 2013 04:59:48 +0000 NCD comment 182561 at http://dagblog.com The worst aspect is the sheer http://dagblog.com/comment/182558#comment-182558 <a id="comment-182558"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/nsa-read-your-emails-and-all-you-got-was-lousy-fake-terrorism-prosecution-17228">The NSA Read Your Emails and All You Got Was This Lousy Fake Terrorism Prosecution</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The worst aspect is the sheer arbitrariness. A terrorist or terrorist group is whoever the U.S. government designates a terrorist or terrorist group.<br /><br /> The Iranian Revolutionary Guard were once just a branch of Iran's military. The U.S. got increasingly pissed off at Iran, so now they are officially terrorists. The world rightly deemed the anti-Iranian government group MEK terrorists. They hired some congressional lobbyists, and now they're simply dissidents -- at least in American eyes. A government shameless enough to formally pretend the military takeover in Egypt was not a coup is capable of any semantic bullshit.<br /><br /> President Obama is a constitutional scholar. I'm not, but even I know that the U.S. Constitution specifically bans bills of attainder. I'm sure Anwar al-Awlaki was a really nasty guy, but I'm also sure the bill of rights trumps the traditional Texas defense that "he needed killin'."<br /><br /> So far, U.S. legislators, White House, judiciary, media and most of the public seem to think otherwise, that this is all being done to "keep us safe." I think far too high a price is being paid, but I'm just some furriner. Carry on.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:51:03 +0000 acanuck comment 182558 at http://dagblog.com