dagblog - Comments for "NSA Intends To Fire 90% Of Their System Administrators" http://dagblog.com/link/nsa-intends-fire-90-their-system-administrators-17231 Comments for "NSA Intends To Fire 90% Of Their System Administrators" en not much in the way of http://dagblog.com/comment/182569#comment-182569 <a id="comment-182569"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/nsa-intends-fire-90-their-system-administrators-17231">NSA Intends To Fire 90% Of Their System Administrators</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>not much in the way of details and the devil is in the details.</p> <p> </p> <p>automation has a tendency to be very specific in carrying out tasks, but not everything can be documented with the associated taskings necessary to be carried out</p> <p> </p> <p>and sometimes automation does the unexpected and puts something somewhere where it doesn't belong and no one can locate it later when  its needed.</p> <p> </p> <p>and then there are times when it's flagged in a way that makes it either a false positive  or a false negative.</p> <p> </p> <p>automation can't make cognitive decisions ... I would think the NSAwould know tht.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:21:27 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 182569 at http://dagblog.com The stuff about automation in http://dagblog.com/comment/182560#comment-182560 <a id="comment-182560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/nsa-intends-fire-90-their-system-administrators-17231">NSA Intends To Fire 90% Of Their System Administrators</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The stuff about automation in the article seems to be a way to not talk about outsourcing security work as a corporate enterprise.</p> <p>Or: 'Snowden was just a cog that another cog could cog just as well as a wood chuck could chuck wood.'</p> <p>This announcement comes at an interesting time. With the shuttering of embassies in anticipation of terror attacks, at least some people think the work done by these contractors has no bearing on the present circumstances.</p> <p>Why fire these people just now?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 10 Aug 2013 00:42:11 +0000 moat comment 182560 at http://dagblog.com NSA director says "automating http://dagblog.com/comment/182559#comment-182559 <a id="comment-182559"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/182546#comment-182546">Geez, amazing. 90%? You can&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NSA director says "automating much of the work would improve security." Because wholly automated systems virtually never experience glitches. And I'm sure having 900 disgruntled ex-employees with intimate knowledge of NSA operations won't pose any problems either. Amazing!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:59:27 +0000 acanuck comment 182559 at http://dagblog.com Geez, amazing. 90%? You can't http://dagblog.com/comment/182546#comment-182546 <a id="comment-182546"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/nsa-intends-fire-90-their-system-administrators-17231">NSA Intends To Fire 90% Of Their System Administrators</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Geez, amazing. 90%? You can't trust a geek, fire them all? Isn't this sort of like: you can't find a Pashtun translator you can trust?</p> <p>And to systems administrators in private jobs: be afraid, be very afraid. Geek libertarianism is not going to help you now in keeping that good salary...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:03:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 182546 at http://dagblog.com