dagblog - Comments for "Obama&#039;s Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They&#039;ll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts" http://dagblog.com/link/obamas-top-economic-adviser-tells-democrats-theyll-have-swallow-entitlement-cuts-17665 Comments for "Obama's Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They'll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts" en As (Budget) Talks Open, http://dagblog.com/comment/185731#comment-185731 <a id="comment-185731"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obamas-top-economic-adviser-tells-democrats-theyll-have-swallow-entitlement-cuts-17665">Obama&#039;s Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They&#039;ll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/us/politics/budget-negotiations-open-with-signs-of-conciliation.html?hp">As (Budget) Talks Open, Democrats Show Signs of Division</a><br /> By Jackie Calmes and Jonhathan Weisman, <em>New York Times,</em> Oct. 30/31, 2013</p> <p>President Obama and congressional Democrats, united in recent fiscal fights, are showing some divisions as budget negotiations opened to avert another crisis.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:27:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 185731 at http://dagblog.com If Obama keeps his promises http://dagblog.com/comment/185665#comment-185665 <a id="comment-185665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/185655#comment-185655">&quot;Entitlements&quot; = &quot;Social</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>    If Obama keeps his promises about Social Security, then(if the Republicans agree to raise taxes) the cut in benefits will be $100-200 a year.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:14:51 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 185665 at http://dagblog.com "Entitlements" = "Social http://dagblog.com/comment/185655#comment-185655 <a id="comment-185655"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/185647#comment-185647">If entitlement cuts were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Entitlements" = "Social Security". Nixon goes to China. Just wait.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:34:57 +0000 Anonymous pp comment 185655 at http://dagblog.com If entitlement cuts were http://dagblog.com/comment/185647#comment-185647 <a id="comment-185647"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/185641#comment-185641">Obama wants entitlement cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>  If entitlement cuts were Obama's dream, he wouldn't be promising to veto a cut in food stamps, his budgets wouldn't have such generous social spending, and he wouldn't have created the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. His proposed cuts in Medicare(which would only go into effect if the Republicans agree to tax cuts) aren't cuts in benefits.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:26:56 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 185647 at http://dagblog.com The Senate won't be able to http://dagblog.com/comment/185643#comment-185643 <a id="comment-185643"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/185636#comment-185636">Obama: the wolf in sheep</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Senate won't be able to pass that.  Too much pressure will be put on them from the voters.  The Democrats want to gain back the control of both Houses.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:01:12 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 185643 at http://dagblog.com I dare them. They have no http://dagblog.com/comment/185642#comment-185642 <a id="comment-185642"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obamas-top-economic-adviser-tells-democrats-theyll-have-swallow-entitlement-cuts-17665">Obama&#039;s Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They&#039;ll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I dare them.  They have no idea how big that will back fire. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:57:30 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 185642 at http://dagblog.com Obama wants entitlement cuts http://dagblog.com/comment/185641#comment-185641 <a id="comment-185641"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obamas-top-economic-adviser-tells-democrats-theyll-have-swallow-entitlement-cuts-17665">Obama&#039;s Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They&#039;ll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama wants entitlement cuts - it's been his "Nixon goes to China" dream since before he got elected.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:26:06 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 185641 at http://dagblog.com Obama: the wolf in sheep http://dagblog.com/comment/185636#comment-185636 <a id="comment-185636"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/obamas-top-economic-adviser-tells-democrats-theyll-have-swallow-entitlement-cuts-17665">Obama&#039;s Top Economic Adviser Tells Democrats They&#039;ll Have to Swallow Entitlement Cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama: the wolf in sheep clothing; .has always been the tool of those, who have always been about increasing the numbers in the slave class pool; whether it is by giving amnesty to 12 million more low wage workers, who will work to undercut our wages  or by destroying the equity in peoples homes, so they'll have no nest egg besides; the crumbs "the government say's were entitled to".</p> <p>Work longer and cheaper so America can compete in the world market place, in order to reward the fat cats, who are not satisfied, till they get the whole pie and then bitch because the peasants want the few crumbs, that fall from the table that should have been collected for the barons so they could profit from the crumbs also..   </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:18:26 +0000 AnonymousR comment 185636 at http://dagblog.com