dagblog - Comments for "GOP Threatens More Scalias, Thomases if Reid Nukes" http://dagblog.com/link/gop-threatens-more-scalias-thomases-if-reid-nukes-17755 Comments for "GOP Threatens More Scalias, Thomases if Reid Nukes" en Wow! That really chafes my http://dagblog.com/comment/186268#comment-186268 <a id="comment-186268"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186266#comment-186266">As much fun as it is to make</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow!  That really chafes my grits (since Jimmy Carter's name has come up)...I had previously proposed a  constitutional amendment (prompted by W's mispronunciation) to the effect that no one might be elected president who could not pronounce "nuclear"...Carter I can grok, he being disadvantaged by a Georgia birth, but Ike??!!!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:45:45 +0000 jollyroger comment 186268 at http://dagblog.com Probably much older than Ike. http://dagblog.com/comment/186267#comment-186267 <a id="comment-186267"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186266#comment-186266">As much fun as it is to make</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Probably much older than Ike. In Edwin O'Connor's 1956 Irish-American saga, <em>The Last Hurrah</em>, someone tells a joke: If a priest says "nucular," he's just a diocesan, if he says "nuclear," he must be a Jesuit.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:43:20 +0000 Donal comment 186267 at http://dagblog.com As much fun as it is to make http://dagblog.com/comment/186266#comment-186266 <a id="comment-186266"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186265#comment-186265">Not for nuttin&#039;, the &quot;Nucular</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As much fun as it is to make fun of Republicans, I think we can credit our very own <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter#Naval_career">"nucular" physicist</a> Jimmy Carter for the invention of that particular pronunciation.</p> <p>Edit to add: it appears that we can blame Republicans if we want to, as Eisenhower <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucular#Notable_users">used this pronunciation</a> himself.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:01:58 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 186266 at http://dagblog.com Not for nuttin', the "Nucular http://dagblog.com/comment/186265#comment-186265 <a id="comment-186265"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186258#comment-186258">And we have every reason to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> Not for nuttin', the "Nucular Option" (ya gotta say it like a Repugnant) was their invention...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:02:33 +0000 jollyroger comment 186265 at http://dagblog.com Absolutely accurate. And they http://dagblog.com/comment/186260#comment-186260 <a id="comment-186260"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186258#comment-186258">And we have every reason to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Absolutely accurate.</p> <p>And they would just love it if half the Fed judge positions were not filled (due to Democrats 'being restrained and following tradition') when<em> in their fantasies </em>the GOP wins the Oval Office in 2016.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:09:42 +0000 NCD comment 186260 at http://dagblog.com And we have every reason to http://dagblog.com/comment/186258#comment-186258 <a id="comment-186258"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gop-threatens-more-scalias-thomases-if-reid-nukes-17755">GOP Threatens More Scalias, Thomases if Reid Nukes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And we have every reason to believe that if the Democrats used the filibuster like the Republicans, then the Republicans would've <em>already</em> nuked the filibuster. They don't need no stinkin' precedent to do so in the future, either.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:27:50 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 186258 at http://dagblog.com So they will just have to win http://dagblog.com/comment/186254#comment-186254 <a id="comment-186254"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gop-threatens-more-scalias-thomases-if-reid-nukes-17755">GOP Threatens More Scalias, Thomases if Reid Nukes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So they will just have to win some elections other in gerrymandered districts in the House.  I don't think the threat holds water right now.  The electorate is going in a different direction from the past 35 years.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:13:56 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 186254 at http://dagblog.com