dagblog - Comments for "Cameras in female bathrooms revealed"

It used to be fone freakers

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:12:02 +0000

In reply to Just parenthetically, does

It used to be fone freakers could get hired by AT&T by showing exceptional illegal prowess.

Perhaps the janitors have a budding career awaiting them at the NSA /FBI / CIA or other distinguished parts of our alphabet soup. Who woulda thunk it, bathroom pervert as a career choice. Wonder if they have special detectors for wide stance.

Just parenthetically, does

jollyroger — Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:53:54 +0000

In reply to Finally solved - if a tree

Just parenthetically, does this not mean that there is a cohort of enterprising high school janitors who could come forward, and admit to their as yet undiscovered video emplacements, pleading the NSA rule as a bar to prosecution? Or does the admission constitute immediate (retroactive) privacy violation? These are troubling questions...

Finally solved - if a tree

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:34:02 +0000

In reply to I am vastly relieved to learn

Finally solved - if a tree falls in the woods, and no one hears it, it didn't fall. Whew - next dialectic please...

I am vastly relieved to learn

jollyroger — Sat, 16 Nov 2013 01:41:22 +0000

In reply to Cameras in female bathrooms revealed

I am vastly relieved to learn that as long as I am unaware of the violation, my privacy has not been violated...Something of an existentialist milestone, I should think.