dagblog - Comments for "&quot;It&#039;ll be a tough November for this little Serbian,&quot; wrote little Jew, David Wildstein." http://dagblog.com/link/itll-be-tough-november-little-serbian-wrote-little-jew-david-wildstein-18048 Comments for ""It'll be a tough November for this little Serbian," wrote little Jew, David Wildstein." en Boy, having a bedroom romp http://dagblog.com/comment/188465#comment-188465 <a id="comment-188465"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188457#comment-188457">My, my. I guess the little</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Boy, having a bedroom romp with Christy would take courage.  Working for Walmart would look good in comparison. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:48:30 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 188465 at http://dagblog.com That Christie is a whole http://dagblog.com/comment/188463#comment-188463 <a id="comment-188463"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188457#comment-188457">My, my. I guess the little</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That Christie is a whole lotta man!  (If Kissinger could get over on the aphrodesiac effect of power, anyone can).</p> <p> </p> <p>And don't blame me-I made my living as a sex object.</p> <p> </p> <p>That said, I think we can reliably predict that Christie is a sex harasser first class.  By history, he has the merit badge</p> <p><a href="http://swampwatch.com/2013/10/01/chris-christies-extramartial-affair-under-scrutiny-in-gay-marriage-appeal/">http://swampwatch.com/2013/10/01/chris-christies-extramartial-affair-under-scrutiny-in-gay-marriage-appeal/</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Edit to add: I know it will not surprise you to learn that not infrequently, beautiful women who work for powerful, if repulsive, men find it possible to suppress their disgust where a top level administrative position is on offer.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:41:30 +0000 jollyroger comment 188463 at http://dagblog.com My, my. I guess the little http://dagblog.com/comment/188457#comment-188457 <a id="comment-188457"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188445#comment-188445">Let me put it crudely, (as a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My, my.  I guess the little doll would have no say in the matter?  Her sweet looks would make it a done deal?  And, really, how could she resist a hunk like Christie?</p> <p>Yes, it must have happened just that way.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:46:04 +0000 Ramona comment 188457 at http://dagblog.com Dammit Tmac, you said you http://dagblog.com/comment/188454#comment-188454 <a id="comment-188454"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188451#comment-188451">Ewww.. Oh My God.. ewww. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dammit Tmac, you said you were <strong>skiing</strong>!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:37:18 +0000 jollyroger comment 188454 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, well, tmac, I gave up http://dagblog.com/comment/188453#comment-188453 <a id="comment-188453"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188451#comment-188451">Ewww.. Oh My God.. ewww. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, well, tmac, I gave up long ago on trying to 'splain the eww factor for women to jolly when he starts talking that way. I figure if no one ever trained him to talk to regular women (and not just dykes and sex workers,) in the end it's not my problem, but his, especially in meatspace, eh? <img alt="cheeky" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/tounge_smile.gif" title="cheeky" width="20" /> Especially since I know from some of his other opinions that his heart is on the right side on the inequality front.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:14:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 188453 at http://dagblog.com Ewww.. Oh My God.. ewww. I http://dagblog.com/comment/188451#comment-188451 <a id="comment-188451"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188441#comment-188441">Since you have been so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ewww.. Oh My God.. ewww. </p> <p>I need to go bleach my brain now. Thanks so much for the jolly. <img alt="surprise" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/omg_smile.gif" title="surprise" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:40:21 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 188451 at http://dagblog.com Well, I respectfully differ http://dagblog.com/comment/188448#comment-188448 <a id="comment-188448"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188447#comment-188447">The video of Tony&#039;s analysis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I respectfully differ with the esteemed <em>goombah</em> on one point.  I <strong>always</strong> put my girlfriends on the payroll...not that I recommend this practice in retrospect, mind you...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:44:39 +0000 jollyroger comment 188448 at http://dagblog.com The video of Tony's analysis http://dagblog.com/comment/188447#comment-188447 <a id="comment-188447"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188443#comment-188443">I dunno. NJ politics gives me</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The video of Tony's analysis of NJ politics is apparently no longer available, but I did find a transcript with photos, here (it was short and sweet, doesn't take long to read):</p> <p><a href="http://fallonfey.com/10-2-04.html">http://fallonfey.com/10-2-04.html</a></p> <p>He didn't agree with you about the wisdom of mixing business with pleasure.</p> <p>And note, the Serbian/Jew stuff is classic, Tony put similar in his commentary</p> <p><font face="Arial" size="2"> ...<em>Everybody knows the big guys handle security and the Jews watch the money</em></font>....</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:43:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 188447 at http://dagblog.com Let me put it crudely, (as a http://dagblog.com/comment/188445#comment-188445 <a id="comment-188445"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188443#comment-188443">I dunno. NJ politics gives me</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Let me put it crudely, (as a dinosaur who always figured that co-ed pussy was part of his professorial compensation package, likewise my secretaries...)</p> <p> </p> <p>If she were working for me, I'd be fucking her.  And I don't think Christie is any different.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:30:57 +0000 jollyroger comment 188445 at http://dagblog.com I dunno. NJ politics gives me http://dagblog.com/comment/188443#comment-188443 <a id="comment-188443"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/188441#comment-188441">Since you have been so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I dunno. NJ politics gives me a headache after a while. There's no real political parties there, only Tony Soprano's.</p> <p>(I recall SNL once did a real good skit with Tony doing comment and analysis on the McGreevey scandals.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:23:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 188443 at http://dagblog.com