dagblog - Comments for "In Defeat for Tea Party, House Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill" http://dagblog.com/link/defeat-tea-party-house-passes-11-trillion-spending-bill-18082 Comments for "In Defeat for Tea Party, House Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill" en EXCLUSIVE | A secret http://dagblog.com/comment/188623#comment-188623 <a id="comment-188623"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/defeat-tea-party-house-passes-11-trillion-spending-bill-18082">In Defeat for Tea Party, House Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/lawmakers-seek-to-stymie-plan-to-shift-control-of-drone-campaign-from-cia-to-pentagon/2014/01/15/c0096b18-7e0e-11e3-9556-4a4bf7bcbd84_story.html?hpid=z1">EXCLUSIVE | A secret provision is inserted in the spending bill to block the transfer of control of drone warfare to the Pentagon.</a><br /> By Greg Miller, <em>The Washington Post</em>, Jan. 15, 2014</p> <p>Congress has moved to block President Obama’s plan to shift control of the U.S. drone campaign from the CIA to the Defense Department, inserting a secret provision in the massive government spending bill introduced this week that would preserve the spy agency’s role in lethal counterterrorism operations, U.S. officials said [....]</p> <p>The provision represents an unusually direct intervention by lawmakers into the way covert operations are run, impeding an administration plan aimed at returning the CIA’s focus to traditional intelligence gathering and possibly bringing more transparency to drone strikes.</p> <p>The move also reflects some lawmakers’ lingering doubts about the U.S. military’s ability to conduct strikes against al-Qaeda and its regional affiliates without hitting the wrong targets and killing civilians. '[....]</p> <p>The extent of the restrictions contained in the drone provision remained unclear. The measure was included by members of the House and Senate appropriations committees, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly on the legislation. Other senior lawmakers and congressional officials declined to comment on the contents of the classified annex, which details funding for U.S. spy agencies [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:51:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 188623 at http://dagblog.com