dagblog - Comments for "US supreme court debates background check laws in anonymous gun sale case" http://dagblog.com/link/us-supreme-court-debates-background-check-laws-anonymous-gun-sale-case-18116 Comments for "US supreme court debates background check laws in anonymous gun sale case" en Argument recap: When http://dagblog.com/comment/188938#comment-188938 <a id="comment-188938"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-supreme-court-debates-background-check-laws-anonymous-gun-sale-case-18116">US supreme court debates background check laws in anonymous gun sale case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>Argument recap: When compromise is the problem</strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em>Samuel A. Alito, Jr., conjured up the image of a “Mr. Straw” running a very busy gun-buying operation that showed how easy it was to get around the law.  So, Alito said, Congress did something “utterly meaningless.”</em></p> <p><em>Justice Sonia Sotomayor, with a note of despair in her voice, wondered aloud whether the law was so unclear that it just meant “a buyer is a buyer is a buyer.”   She suggested that, if the law were that opaque, could a buyer sell a gun to a person barred from having it?  Dietz said there were other laws to take care of that.</em></p> <p><em>Perhaps the low moment for Palmore was when Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., noted that the language in the law had been “fought over, tooth and nail” by the opposing sides in the gun control debate, and that the compromise which resulted simply had nothing to do with the idea of a “straw purchaser.”  That, of course, was one of attorney Dietz’s main talking points.</em></p> <p><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/argument-recap-when-compromise-is-the-problem/">http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/argument-recap-when-compromise-is-the-problem/</a></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:27:22 +0000 Resistance comment 188938 at http://dagblog.com Argument preview: Checking up http://dagblog.com/comment/188937#comment-188937 <a id="comment-188937"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-supreme-court-debates-background-check-laws-anonymous-gun-sale-case-18116">US supreme court debates background check laws in anonymous gun sale case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><strong>Argument preview: Checking up on gun buyers</strong></p> <p><em>The Justice Department urged the Court not to hear the petition, even while conceding that there was some conflict in the lower courts on the scope of the “straw purchaser” law.</em></p> <p><em>Among amici, Abramski has the support of twenty-six states and the territory of Guam, and of a variety of gun owners’ associations, including the NRA.</em></p> <p><em><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/argument-preview-checking-up-on-gun-buyers/">http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/argument-preview-checking-up-on-gun-buyers/</a></em></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Case of </span><em style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/abramski-v-united-states/?wpmp_switcher=desktop" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">Abramski v. United State</a>s.</em></p> <blockquote> <p><strong>Supreme Court Grants Cert in Abramski v. United States</strong></p> <p><em>Posted on January 17, 2014</em></p> <p><a href="http://www.nraila.org/legal/articles/2014/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-abramski-v-united-states.aspx">http://www.nraila.org/legal/articles/2014/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-abramski-v-united-states.aspx</a></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:18:39 +0000 Resistance comment 188937 at http://dagblog.com