dagblog - Comments for "Yes, You Can Still Watch Woody Allen Movies and Ignore Nick Kristof" http://dagblog.com/politics/yes-you-can-still-watch-woody-allen-movies-and-nick-kristoff-corrupt-18166 Comments for "Yes, You Can Still Watch Woody Allen Movies and Ignore Nick Kristof" en Intriguing to see someone http://dagblog.com/comment/256559#comment-256559 <a id="comment-256559"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/256549#comment-256549">Actually you prove here</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Intriguing to see someone obviously googling about Woody today and passionate enough about the issue to comment.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:05:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 256559 at http://dagblog.com Actually you prove here http://dagblog.com/comment/256549#comment-256549 <a id="comment-256549"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/189641#comment-189641">Dylan Farrow&#039;s account of her</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually you prove here EXACTLY why Mr. Allen maintains silence for the most part on these issues. It's not like he hasn't spoken to them.  He knows however that people will make anything of his words they wish to.  And of course you've decided to make something literally out of nothing - him being silent.  Wow.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Aug 2018 22:54:20 +0000 Anonymous comment 256549 at http://dagblog.com Casey Pascal was heavily http://dagblog.com/comment/253602#comment-253602 <a id="comment-253602"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/189661#comment-189661">That Vanity Fair story was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Casey Pascal was heavily biased in Mia Farrow's favor! She was Mia's childhood best friend! Fiercely loyal to Mia, and hated Woody Allen. Why don't you quote someone who was NOT biased in Mia's favor? You can also shop around for sympathetic judges, and that is just what Mia did - found a judge who would disapprove of Woody's relationship with Soon Yi, thereby increasing the odds that he would judge in her (Mia's) favor!<br /><br /> Woody likely was never "obsessed" with Dylan; instead, Mia used his love for his child against him. She told Woody when Satchel was born "don't get close to him, this relationship is going nowhere", and devoted all her time to Satchel, the baby (Frank's love child?), while Dylan was sort of neglected by her, so she could devote all her time to him. Mia also writes in her autobiography how Satchel cried all the time as a baby (colicy maybe), and she had to spend more time with him. So where did that leave Dylan? To be cared more for by Woody! Of course he adored her - she was a charming and adorable baby, toddler and preschooler. Mia old turned his love for his daughter into something twisted and evil AFTER SHE FOUND OUT ABOUT HIM AND SOON Yi.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jun 2018 05:29:01 +0000 Jane comment 253602 at http://dagblog.com I had to read this sixteen http://dagblog.com/comment/200307#comment-200307 <a id="comment-200307"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/yes-you-can-still-watch-woody-allen-movies-and-nick-kristoff-corrupt-18166">Yes, You Can Still Watch Woody Allen Movies and Ignore Nick Kristof</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I had to read this sixteen times.</p> <p>I initially thought you were talking about Bob Dylan who was a well known drug dealer:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"><a href="http://en.musicplayon.com/play?v=278379">http://en.musicplayon.com/play?v=278379</a></div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>copyright probs</p> <p> </p> <p>I like this lady anyway</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-puGmZrAnKg" width="560px"></iframe></div> <p>Okay that is enough.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:16:28 +0000 Richard Day comment 200307 at http://dagblog.com Prudent, just don't get into http://dagblog.com/comment/190234#comment-190234 <a id="comment-190234"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190229#comment-190229">As you probably know; I don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Prudent, just don't get into a fight with one because it ain't purty when you get taken inside.  That was a helluva lot of fun going over that story when I was trying to get admitted to the bar--as in the legal one.  But I digress. . .</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:02:34 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 190234 at http://dagblog.com Thank you Kelly, you've http://dagblog.com/comment/190233#comment-190233 <a id="comment-190233"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190215#comment-190215">I never take the time to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thank you Kelly, you've earned the right to say what you've said and then some.   </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:58:03 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 190233 at http://dagblog.com A retired lawyer, or a http://dagblog.com/comment/190231#comment-190231 <a id="comment-190231"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190203#comment-190203">So does that mean that when</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A retired lawyer, or a working lawyer, has the right to his or her opinion on a case that he or she isn't or wasn't involved in.  I read Michael's comment to mean that the prosecutor who was involved in the Allen investigation made the statement.   </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:55:41 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 190231 at http://dagblog.com No idea. http://dagblog.com/comment/190230#comment-190230 <a id="comment-190230"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190226#comment-190226">What ever happened to her?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No idea.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:33:03 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 190230 at http://dagblog.com As you probably know; I don't http://dagblog.com/comment/190229#comment-190229 <a id="comment-190229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190228#comment-190228">I&#039;m not a lawyer so I really</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As you probably know; I don't trust them either. </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:17:49 +0000 Resistance comment 190229 at http://dagblog.com I'm not a lawyer so I really http://dagblog.com/comment/190228#comment-190228 <a id="comment-190228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/190227#comment-190227">Can you refuse? Can&#039;t the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm not a lawyer so I really don't know. This was a large RV, like a house, not a car so it may be there are different rules. All I can say is he asked me to let the dog inside the RV. I refused. He told me if I didn't consent he'd keep me there for an hour until he got a search warrant but if the dog went through and found nothing I'd be gone in 10 minutes. I told him to go get his search warrant. He questioned me for about those 10 minutes, trying to trip me up on my story. Which was completely true so I had no lies to remember or mess up. Then he let me go. Perhaps he was perceptive enough to see I was not worried or nervous. Because I was innocent.</p> <p>My inclination is to be polite and respectful but not to cooperate with cops when I'm a suspect. I don't trust them.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:06:45 +0000 ocean-kat comment 190228 at http://dagblog.com