dagblog - Comments for "A Writer asks a Famous Writer to Stop Writing Because–Why Again?" http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/writer-asks-famous-writer-stop-writing-because-why-again-18273 Comments for "A Writer asks a Famous Writer to Stop Writing Because–Why Again?" en Momoe, that's so neat that http://dagblog.com/comment/192188#comment-192188 <a id="comment-192188"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/192136#comment-192136">They are JKR fans and the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Momoe, that's so neat that they bought you Michael's book without knowing that you knew him!  Yay, Michael!  Yay, your kids!</p> <p>I really don't have a problem with loyal HP fans going after her for what she wrote, but I still think it crossed the line when they went over to Amazon to trash her book.  Fair play would be to stick with the essay she wrote, which is what they found offensive, and keep the comments to the content of the essay. </p> <p>It doesn't matter that they made it clear they hadn't read her book and were only creating a review because they were angry at what she said about Jo Rowling.  They weren't satisfied with just sticking to the forums where the discussions were about the essay.  When they moved it over to Amazon they clearly meant to hurt her where it hurts most.  To me that was a Malfoy move.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:49:01 +0000 Ramona comment 192188 at http://dagblog.com They are JKR fans and the http://dagblog.com/comment/192136#comment-192136 <a id="comment-192136"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191972#comment-191972">Great idea! I&#039;ll bet if she</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They are JKR fans and the most loyal that are still spending time and money to promote her characters and books.  They buy and collect Harry Potter items.  I read all the reviews that were 4 and 5 stars first and then looked at the 1 stars.  The 1 stars made a point to say they had not read the book and didn't like her assessment of JKR.   The social media slap her on the wrist with the outrage she caused.  She kicked over a bee hive.  </p> <p>My grandson bought me Mike's first book, the same kid who showed me Shepard's article. By the way he is an English major and wants to teach.  He and his wife had no idea that I had any association on line with the author.  They just thought it was a terrific book that I would like.  They were very pleased with my thrill over the gift.  As we worked on the Harry Potter scarves he read the tweets and comments from the article as they came in. The last time we followed tweets and comments together was the night Wendy Davis did her filibuster in Texas.  The comments and tweets were for the most part very entertaining about Shepard.  The 1 star reviews came later but were not from the early tweets and comments.  Those 1 stars probably came from Amazon accounts. We looked her up to see what kind of author she was because non of us knew who she was.    </p> <p>I know all of you work very hard on your writing and she did too.  Just the same, I had a fun adventure and quality time with my family exploring a stupid mistake a writer can make.   </p> <p>  </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:33:37 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 192136 at http://dagblog.com Great idea! I'll bet if she http://dagblog.com/comment/191972#comment-191972 <a id="comment-191972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191953#comment-191953">Your Malfoy comment makes me</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great idea!  I'll bet if she knew about this, she would do it, too.  I'll be watching. . .</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:03:21 +0000 Ramona comment 191972 at http://dagblog.com Your Malfoy comment makes me http://dagblog.com/comment/191953#comment-191953 <a id="comment-191953"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191893#comment-191893">She made a cheap shot to get</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your Malfoy comment makes me think, "What would really bookend this nicely is if JKR came out and condemned these Amazon mob-reviews in exactly that language." There's nothing like coming to the defense of someone who has just insulted you to make you look like a class act.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:25:54 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 191953 at http://dagblog.com I agree with Ramona. The http://dagblog.com/comment/191902#comment-191902 <a id="comment-191902"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191893#comment-191893">She made a cheap shot to get</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree with Ramona. The punitive Amazon reviews are over the line.</p> <p>Ted Nugent has said a bunch of things that deserve censure. Going to pummel his old albums in online reviews. Neither am I going to ding Cat Stevens albums because Yusuf Islam can be an idiot.</p> <p>Public speech should get pushback when it's earned it. But the pushback should be related to the public speech itself.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:58:53 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 191902 at http://dagblog.com She made a cheap shot to get http://dagblog.com/comment/191893#comment-191893 <a id="comment-191893"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191858#comment-191858">I know they were from non</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>She made a cheap shot to get traffic to her books on the web.  The Hogwarts are obliging her. At least that is how they see it.</p> </blockquote> <p>I dunno.  Maybe this hits too close to home.  I think trashing someone's book on Amazon because she wrote an infuriating essay is crossing way over the line.</p> <p>How about this?  What if Michael Wolraich wrote a post that everyone came down on and someone thought it would be cool to punish him by heading over to Amazon to mob-review his new book?  (I'm using MW as an example only because he does have a new book coming out.)</p> <p>When I look at book reviews at Amazon I'll often just look at the ratings and if there are too many low ratings I move on.  Unless it's a book I already know something about I don't look to see what the reviewers are saying. </p> <p>IMO, no matter what she said in that essay, she didn't deserve that.  I don't see the Hogwarts as heroes.  It's something Malfoy and his bunch would do.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:56:28 +0000 Ramona comment 191893 at http://dagblog.com I know they were from non http://dagblog.com/comment/191858#comment-191858 <a id="comment-191858"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191797#comment-191797">Momoe, I don&#039;t know what kind</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know they were from non readers and in response to her remarks.  I still thought they were rather fun.  The reason was I have a large stack of Harry Potter striped scarves sitting in front of me that my grand daughter-in-law is making for Metro-Con coming up in July.  She hopes to have several hundred of them made by then as well as the other scarves she made before Christmas.  She tells me she will sell all of them because Harry Potter is still a well loved character.  I knew about Shepard's Hufpo piece as soon as it came out.  The Hogwarts were on it. We looked her up and read the promo's of her 2 books.  She made a cheap shot to get traffic to her books on the web.  The Hogwarts are obliging her. At least that is how they see it. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:37:44 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 191858 at http://dagblog.com This is exactly why I haven't http://dagblog.com/comment/191834#comment-191834 <a id="comment-191834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/writer-asks-famous-writer-stop-writing-because-why-again-18273">A Writer asks a Famous Writer to Stop Writing Because–Why Again?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is exactly why I haven't blogged for so long--to give you all some oxygen.</p> <p>;)</p> <p>PS Excluding my usual sock puppets of course.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:18:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 191834 at http://dagblog.com Wise words, as always, from http://dagblog.com/comment/191806#comment-191806 <a id="comment-191806"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191732#comment-191732">It seems to me that this Lynn</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wise words, as always, from Mr. Smith:</p> <blockquote> <p>There is no shortage of creativity, except in the minds of those that believe in a scarcity of imagination.   These are self-imposed limitations, not universal ones.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:23:01 +0000 Ramona comment 191806 at http://dagblog.com Momoe, I don't know what kind http://dagblog.com/comment/191797#comment-191797 <a id="comment-191797"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/191794#comment-191794">She sure stepped into it! </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Momoe, I don't know what kind of writer she is but most of the one-star reviews are phony.  They're pay-backs for her article on J.K. Rowling.  Most of them were published yesterday, after her article came out. </p> <p>Will people read her now?  I don't know.  But I hope the decisions will be based on her work and not on the dozens of one-star reviews that have nothing to do with her book.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:27:46 +0000 Ramona comment 191797 at http://dagblog.com