dagblog - Comments for "Obamacare is a complex, unjust,expensive,error-prone system"

There is one way in which

jollyroger — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:46:34 +0000

In reply to There's a distinction between

There is one way in which vouchers could be attractive..

If, like me, your retirement plan is to move to a third world country, and marry a 20 year old widow (with 5 kids who you adopt thus multiplying your social security pittance into a princely sum for the local price structure), if you could take your medicare voucher and buy the bargain priced local health care, it would be sweet.

There's a distinction between

Peter Schwartz — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:28:12 +0000

In reply to Obamacare is a complex, unjust,expensive,error-prone system

There's a distinction between vouchers and premium support.

It goes something like this: A voucher has a set "face amount" and is a given amount of "money" you can spend to buy insurance.

If you can't find the policy you want for that amount of money, you have to make up the difference between the voucher's face amount and the policy's cost. Or buy a less expensive policy, etc.

Premium support floats (more or less) with the cost of the policies on the market. It may be based on a percentage of the cost of a policy, whatever that cost may be.

So if your premium support is 50%, 50% of your premiums will be covered regardless of the cost of those premiums. Something like this.

This was quite a controversy a while back when conservatives were arguing that certain health care economists supported their voucher proposals. Said economists or policy makers (can't remember which) disagreed and said they were talking about premium support, not vouchers.

Of course, the face values of vouchers can also be increased as policy costs fluctuate, but they probably tend to lag the market. So it's a less efficient solution (or one that imposes draconian belt-tightening on the buyer) and can leave a buyer hanging out there with insufficient means to buy the policy he needs.

All of this. I agree with all

tmccarthy0 — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:27:42 +0000

In reply to Absolutely! And I disagree

All of this. I agree with all of this!!

I hope it is not to just

CVille Dem — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:30:54 +0000

In reply to I keep checking back in

I hope it is not to just increase the "reads."

I keep checking back in

CVille Dem — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:29:26 +0000

In reply to Obamacare is a complex, unjust,expensive,error-prone system

I keep checking back in because I see " 2 new comments," or in this cae, "3 new comments,". But no new comments. What is this about?

Absolutely! And I disagree

CVille Dem — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:37:17 +0000

In reply to And still better than what we

Absolutely! And I disagree with the "unjust" comment. Expensive? Yeah, but so is getting your routine care in ERs, and this system is better.

Only someone who could not get insurance before because of pesky things like a history of breast cancer, back pain, domestic abuse, diabetes, high blood pressure...the list goes on...can fully appreciate what a godsend this ObamaCare is. Would I have preferred single-payer? Absolutely! Medicare for all? Yes. But we couldn't have gotten either one of those, so we have this, and we are damn lucky to have it.

When they give statistics about who likes/doesn't like the ACA, I really wish they would include all those who have employer-provided health insurance as a separate group; after all, they have nothing to gain from this except that they can know that they can't be dropped once they get sick (which most people really don't realize could have happened before).

If you have gold-plated insurance it requires a true commitment to the Common Good to be in favor of the ACA and I never see that noted as a factor when statistics are thrown out there.

As to the complaint that it is "complex"...well, what isn't?

Here it is. Sorry, it is an

CVille Dem — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:33:42 +0000

In reply to I don't care what you say, I

Here it is. Sorry, it is an extended interview with no synopsis: http://www.peoplespharmacy.com/2009/01/10/extended-interv-26/

jan

I saw an interview with

CVille Dem — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:30:21 +0000

In reply to I don't care what you say, I

I saw an interview with Ezekiel back when single-payer advocates were being thrown out of meetings (with OUR) side!!!! Old "Zeke" was very forcefully advocating for disbanding Medicare and giving vouchers. I couldn't believe my ears; he sounded like the future Paul Ryan explaining how great this would be for elders -- getting to surf the web every year to find a company that would meet their needs -- what a nightmare! I haven't been able to conjure up any respect for him since. I will try to find the link to the interview. I saved it but have changed computers since then and it must have gotten lost.

(No subject)

Ramona — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:13:29 +0000

In reply to Jokester: What has big floppy

What ? No photo? At least

Flavius — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:43:11 +0000

In reply to The address to the site is

What ? No photo? At least Ramona provided a picture.