dagblog - Comments for "WHY I LOVE BEING BLACK" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/why-i-love-being-black-18408 Comments for "WHY I LOVE BEING BLACK" en You are delusional You "knew" http://dagblog.com/comment/193942#comment-193942 <a id="comment-193942"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193932#comment-193932">Oh no. I well aware of what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are delusional</p> <p>You "knew" , but you were asking me to supply information on Buckley, Farrakhan and Wright while you were supporting Buckley. You were not well informed.</p> <p>Thanks for adding humor to the day.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:56:15 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193942 at http://dagblog.com Oh no. I well aware of what http://dagblog.com/comment/193932#comment-193932 <a id="comment-193932"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193931#comment-193931">I now realize that you aren&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh no. I well aware of what you're talking about. Its just very complicated and I wouldn't ever attempt to have a rational dialog with you about it. I pick my subjects and limit how far I'm willing to be side tracked, and I don't get drawn into dialog on subject with people I don't think can handle them. You have a simple version of the world and I think I've already gone beyond your level of sophistication with my last post.</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/open-letter-richard-and-other-young-black-people-18392#comment-193930">http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/open-letter-richard-and-other-young-blac...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 05:31:49 +0000 ocean-kat comment 193932 at http://dagblog.com I now realize that you aren't http://dagblog.com/comment/193931#comment-193931 <a id="comment-193931"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193925#comment-193925">Wright is simply a local</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I now realize that you aren't well read enough to know the full details of Ron Paul or William F Buckley. You have no earthly clue why people would be upset.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 05:17:49 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193931 at http://dagblog.com Educate yourself on the http://dagblog.com/comment/193927#comment-193927 <a id="comment-193927"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193925#comment-193925">Wright is simply a local</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Educate yourself on the racism in Buckley's National Review. I think you need to find more time in the day to read. Also read up on all of the details of your buddy Ron Paul, you avoiding addressing it.</p> <p>If I brushed aside Farrakhan's racism and anti-Semitism like you brush off Ron Paul's racism, I would be challenged and crticized.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 04:03:07 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193927 at http://dagblog.com Wright is simply a local http://dagblog.com/comment/193925#comment-193925 <a id="comment-193925"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193919#comment-193919">You told me that I needed to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wright is simply a local preacher who is famous for having Obama as a member of his congregation. I don't consider him worth the time to study because I never thought his affiliation with Obama was significant enough to tarnish Obama. I've always thought his membership in the church was mostly politically motivated. You just seemed to hate Wright  so much I was curious why. Do you seriously consider Wright such a major historical figure that one needs to study him? Anyway thanks for the reference. I did look it up and I agree he's antisemitic. After the initial brew ha ha I ignored him as a non entity. So I didn't see some of the later interviews. There's only so much time in a day to read.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 03:37:06 +0000 ocean-kat comment 193925 at http://dagblog.com You told me that I needed to http://dagblog.com/comment/193919#comment-193919 <a id="comment-193919"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193915#comment-193915">I haven&#039;t read or watched any</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You told me that I needed to study history. You appear not to be well informed. Google Jeremiah Wright and "them Jews". Educate Yourself. I seriously doubt if you know the racism demonstrated by the guy you are praising.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 03:04:15 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193919 at http://dagblog.com I haven't read or watched any http://dagblog.com/comment/193915#comment-193915 <a id="comment-193915"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193907#comment-193907">On another thread, people are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I haven't read or watched any speeches by Farrakhan so I don't know, but he is listed by organizations I respect as an antisemitic so its likely that is true. But I don't recall seeing anything about Jeremy Wright accusing him of antisemitism. Do you have a link to his antisemitic speech?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 02:14:37 +0000 ocean-kat comment 193915 at http://dagblog.com On another thread, people are http://dagblog.com/comment/193907#comment-193907 <a id="comment-193907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193893#comment-193893">RM, Both Ron and Rand Paul</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On another thread, people are praising Ron Paul's stand on drugs. His racism does not matter. They isolate on his view on drugs. Somehow, I don't think Farrakhan or Wright would get the same type of understanding. It is interesting to watch. Two different worlds.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Mar 2014 01:15:39 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193907 at http://dagblog.com RM, Both Ron and Rand Paul http://dagblog.com/comment/193893#comment-193893 <a id="comment-193893"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193887#comment-193887">You can be crazy if you are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>RM,</p> <p>Both Ron and Rand Paul are manipulating the gullible. They are both corporate feudalists who are intent on weakening the government in order to create a vacuum <font size="2">of power so the most malevolent forces in society, the corporate feudalists, can step in and occupy that vacuum. They’re engaged in conventional Republicanism, but with a twist.</font></p> <p><font size="2">The Republicans have been trying to undermine the New Deal, along with its attendant social safety net, every since it’s inception. But they’ve been unsuccessful because these programs enjoy overwhelming public support. So the libertarians have decided to take a new tact. They are cherry-picking issues that have broad public support, like abolishing certain drug laws, and then playing on the public desire to be left alone by the government, in order to garner wider support. But what these single-issue supporters don’t realize is, once libertarians gain power they intend to turn this nation into a corporate state, just like most other Republicans are intent upon.</font></p> <p><font size="2">Another thing that Paul supporters are not considering is that we can control government. All we have to do is wake up, organize, and vote the right people into office. But once the corporate feudalists take over, we won’t have that option - ask the people of Michigan (Michighanistan) whose duly elected officials have been thrown out of office by Gov. Rick Snyder, and replaced with corporate cronies who have absolutely no obligation to the voters. It’s a classic bait-n-switch scam.</font></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:05:41 +0000 Wattree comment 193893 at http://dagblog.com You can be crazy if you are http://dagblog.com/comment/193887#comment-193887 <a id="comment-193887"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/193886#comment-193886">Demographics Are Against the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You can be crazy if you are White. Take Ron Paul for example. Paul has made statements about freeing all non-violent drug offenders. Ron Paul also has a history of publishing racist newsletters and supporting the ability of public businesses to discriminate against minority groups. Paul is considered a hero for taking a bold stance on drugs.</p> <p>If you compare Ron Paul to Louis Farrakhan and say that Farrakhan supports Black families, Black adoption and Black entrepreneurship; and should be praised for challenging Black men to be morally upstanding citizens, you would be considered insane. Farrakhan is a well-mannered, well dressed anti-Semite and racist. You simply cannot use Farrakhan as an example of someone worthy of <strong>any</strong> praise. Ron Paul gets a pass, Farrakhan does not. </p> <p>If former General Colin Powell made a similar statement with a White President in office, he could never show his face in public again let alone be a news analyst.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:44:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 193887 at http://dagblog.com