dagblog - Comments for "What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality" http://dagblog.com/politics/what-would-teddy-do-theodore-roosevelt-net-neutrality-18531 Comments for "What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality" en Ah, I didn't know that. http://dagblog.com/comment/195261#comment-195261 <a id="comment-195261"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195246#comment-195246">The internet is public.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah, I didn't know that. Thanks. P</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 May 2014 00:03:37 +0000 Anonymous PS comment 195261 at http://dagblog.com It's hard for consumers to http://dagblog.com/comment/195255#comment-195255 <a id="comment-195255"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195252#comment-195252">This will probably be where</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's hard for consumers to "demand" anything when there's nowhere else to go. TWC has a monopoly here. Some buildings have RCN. Not mine. And while I would like more choice, I'm not about to go occupy the Time-Warner center (which is no longer affiliated with Time-Warner cable in any case).</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 19:43:20 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195255 at http://dagblog.com This will probably be where http://dagblog.com/comment/195252#comment-195252 <a id="comment-195252"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195248#comment-195248">My only option is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This will probably be where the change comes because consumers will demand more choices or for the communities to set up their own internet utility. Having a public option for services is going to grow as a populous movement.  </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:55:58 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 195252 at http://dagblog.com There is an organized push http://dagblog.com/comment/195250#comment-195250 <a id="comment-195250"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-would-teddy-do-theodore-roosevelt-net-neutrality-18531">What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There is an organized push back from consumers and small providers.  I also know other countries are committed to net neutrality.  This ruling will cause a brain drain because innovation will leave the US.  Europe and South America is more then happy to fill that role.   </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:43:44 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 195250 at http://dagblog.com My only option is http://dagblog.com/comment/195248#comment-195248 <a id="comment-195248"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195242#comment-195242">I am hooked up to Mediacom</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My only option is Time-Warner, which sucks, or DSL, which sucks. I live in the densest city in America yet only have one cable provider</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:18:47 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195248 at http://dagblog.com Thanks! http://dagblog.com/comment/195247#comment-195247 <a id="comment-195247"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195240#comment-195240">That&#039;s some timely history,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:13:19 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195247 at http://dagblog.com The internet is public. http://dagblog.com/comment/195246#comment-195246 <a id="comment-195246"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195241#comment-195241">There was a copywriter I knew</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The internet <em>is</em> public. What's not public is the "last mile" from the internet into your home.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:12:56 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195246 at http://dagblog.com I am hooked up to Mediacom http://dagblog.com/comment/195242#comment-195242 <a id="comment-195242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-would-teddy-do-theodore-roosevelt-net-neutrality-18531">What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am hooked up to Mediacom for my television and my internet connection.</p> <p>Basic cable is provided to everyone through their rent in this building. You cannot escape this 'hook-up'.</p> <p>I pay another forty bucks for internet that includes a telephone hook up.</p> <p>Now I woke up last week to discover that my basic cable hook up no longer includes CSPAN. I can opt in to some local plus tv thingy, but I will have to pay more for it.</p> <p>Now I can receive CSPAN on line anyway so who cares?</p> <p>Well, I have no choice as to cable service at this location. I mean if I went for something like DIRECT SATTELITE I would still be paying MEDIACOM per my rental contract!</p> <p>Oh and I lose CSPAN but I can now have two Fox Sports stations along with two ESPN stations! With the Big Ten network, I now have access to five sport stations. hahahah</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 16:46:47 +0000 Richard Day comment 195242 at http://dagblog.com There was a copywriter I knew http://dagblog.com/comment/195241#comment-195241 <a id="comment-195241"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-would-teddy-do-theodore-roosevelt-net-neutrality-18531">What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There was a copywriter I knew who wrote a headline back in the late 90s: There's A New Railroad Across America...referring to the Internet, but drawing only the benign analogies of course.</p> <p>I don't know the intricacies, but one solution would've been to have treated the Internet like the airwaves as public property. After the government, if not Al Gore, did lay down the infrastructure for the Web, did it not?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 16:42:32 +0000 Anonymous PS comment 195241 at http://dagblog.com That's some timely history, http://dagblog.com/comment/195240#comment-195240 <a id="comment-195240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/what-would-teddy-do-theodore-roosevelt-net-neutrality-18531">What Would Teddy Do? Theodore Roosevelt on Net Neutrality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's some timely history, sir. Well done.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 May 2014 16:19:59 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 195240 at http://dagblog.com