dagblog - Comments for "Dagslog"

Or dagnabitblog?

Ramona — Thu, 08 May 2014 21:30:32 +0000

In reply to While we're upgrading, have

Or dagnabitblog?

While we're upgrading, have

Michael Maiello — Thu, 08 May 2014 19:59:25 +0000

In reply to Dagslog

While we're upgrading, have we considered the traffic enhancing qualities of changing the name to dogblog?

I've decided to keep it at

Michael Wolraich — Thu, 08 May 2014 03:29:27 +0000

In reply to Has anyone mentioned the

I've decided to keep it at 2013 forever as a sort of memorial to something.

You have your wish

rmrd0000 — Thu, 08 May 2014 00:35:32 +0000

In reply to Yes yes yes! When the text

You have your wish

Has anyone mentioned the

Verified Atheist — Wed, 07 May 2014 23:49:14 +0000

In reply to Dagslog

Has anyone mentioned the copyright year yet?

Yeah, right. Like you have a

Michael Wolraich — Wed, 07 May 2014 23:18:15 +0000

In reply to I knew I'd get my own topic

Yeah, right. Like you have a monopoly. 95 percent of the blog posts on the internet should be labeled Asshat.

Yes yes yes! When the text

Michael Wolraich — Wed, 07 May 2014 23:13:00 +0000

In reply to I think that there have been

Yes yes yes! When the text scrunches up against the right wall and disappears only to reemerge at the bottom like some immortal gopher, let it go! When the latest comments feed reads like a political debate between Itchy & Scratchy, let it go! When the argument swallows its own head after consuming the tail, the balls, and everything in between, yes, yes, yes, let it go!

Do not worry! An unanswered comment, no matter how wrong-headed, offensive, or just plain dumb, will not bring down the Republic or even this little corner of the blogosphere we call dag. Indeed, a naked comment left hanging, bored and lonely, at the end of the thread may answer itself better than a million replies.

So yes, I say, let it go, let it go, let it go, for the love of dag, let it go!

Okay, okay...just teasing.

Anonymous PS — Wed, 07 May 2014 20:37:33 +0000

In reply to How about a section for

Okay, okay...just teasing.

I think that there have been

rmrd0000 — Wed, 07 May 2014 19:06:08 +0000

In reply to How about a section for

I think that there have been verbal punches thrown about Israel and even Roman Polanski. Personal comments are inserted in those discussions. Race comes up more often, hence more verbal jousts occur concerning race. There are, through no fault of the website, a limited number of identifiable minority voices. Thus when some things are said, there can be a feeling that a given statement is not addressed, no one else will voice an opposing view. Is your solution to just let things go?

See "dreck" above. Or perhaps

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 07 May 2014 17:57:13 +0000

In reply to How about a section for

See "dreck" above. Or perhaps just shoot me/ban me now.