dagblog - Comments for "Central Planning Envy" http://dagblog.com/politics/central-planning-envy-18563 Comments for "Central Planning Envy" en Silicon Valley may have other http://dagblog.com/comment/195745#comment-195745 <a id="comment-195745"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/central-planning-envy-18563">Central Planning Envy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Silicon Valley may have other plans than the businessification of American politics. Some of them do not think they need America at all.</p> <p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/05/21/1857942/rise-of-the-bond-villains/">Rise of the Bond villains</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 May 2014 13:12:54 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 195745 at http://dagblog.com Why does reading this cause http://dagblog.com/comment/195714#comment-195714 <a id="comment-195714"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/central-planning-envy-18563">Central Planning Envy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>Why does reading this cause my mind's database to access the name of Robert Moses?</p> <p>Moses was the 'master-builder" who destroyed whole communities in order to give us Worlds Fairs and highways only where he wanted them.   He also was instrumental in sending the Dodgers to Los Angeles because he insisted the Brooklyn team could only build a new stadium in Flushing Queens rather than in Brooklyn.   Seems to me that Robert Moses was a good example of the concept of less democracy at the top ... with a personal vision that falls far short of populism even as it pretends to be 'for the people.'</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 May 2014 00:26:36 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 195714 at http://dagblog.com One has to take into http://dagblog.com/comment/195688#comment-195688 <a id="comment-195688"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/central-planning-envy-18563">Central Planning Envy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One has to take into consideration, too, the whole filibuster fiasco that has taken over Congress.  We can't even get to a vote on something when one party has a majority because it doesn't have a super majority.  On a local level, special interests, some of whom are truly worthy of respect, make doing anything nearly impossible. </p> <p> </p> <p>Here is a great article on San Francisco's housing problem: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/14/sf-housing/" target="_blank">How Burrowing Owls Lead to Vomiting Anarchists (or SF's Housing Crisis Explained)</a> that I posted on one of your other blogs.  It really highlights the problem in a place like the bay area.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 21 May 2014 17:20:38 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 195688 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, this speaks to the http://dagblog.com/comment/195674#comment-195674 <a id="comment-195674"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195670#comment-195670">Brooks, Friedman, et al share</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, this speaks to the misuse of the term "populism."  Some dudes at Princeton did a pretty good job figuring out why popular ideas don't become law.  What's weird is that Brooks took an elite failure for his model and his editor said nothing to him.  If I could be editorial page editor of the NY Times I'd actually have my novel finished by now.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 21 May 2014 15:50:31 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 195674 at http://dagblog.com That's a darned good idea... http://dagblog.com/comment/195672#comment-195672 <a id="comment-195672"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195669#comment-195669">So wait, you think the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a darned good idea... "Sure, he's a Sith and shoots lightning out of his fingers, but he turned the Jedi Academy into a charter school!"</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 21 May 2014 15:44:26 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 195672 at http://dagblog.com Brooks, Friedman, et al share http://dagblog.com/comment/195670#comment-195670 <a id="comment-195670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/195669#comment-195669">So wait, you think the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brooks, Friedman, et al share the conceit that their opinions are endorsed by the masses, the "square people" as Friedman has taken to calling them.</p> <p>Why, then, has our popularly-elected government failed to implement the "populist" ideas promoted by such august thinkers? Obviously because our democracy has been hijacked by special interests. If the square people massed in Washington, they would cry Simpson-Bowles! Simpson-Bowles! Simpson-Bowles!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 21 May 2014 15:44:08 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195670 at http://dagblog.com So wait, you think the http://dagblog.com/comment/195669#comment-195669 <a id="comment-195669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/central-planning-envy-18563">Central Planning Envy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So wait, you think the Galactic Senate made a mistake by granting emergency powers to Palpatine?</p> <p>My favorite line from the Brooks column is his recommendation "to use elite Simpson-Bowles-type commissions to push populist reforms." Brooks wouldn't know a populist reform if it stuck a lightsaber up his ass.</p> <p>PS Am I correct in sensing a new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shuts-and-Failures-ebook/dp/B00CXACVG6/ref=sr_1_1/">Maiello-mash</a>, David Brooks on Galactic politics?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 21 May 2014 15:34:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 195669 at http://dagblog.com