dagblog - Comments for "George Will&#039;s Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown" http://dagblog.com/politics/george-wills-backhanded-tribute-sherrod-brown-18762 Comments for "George Will's Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown" en Lol.  Yes, indeedy. http://dagblog.com/comment/197772#comment-197772 <a id="comment-197772"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/197769#comment-197769">Trust the zany right-wingers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lol.  Yes, indeedy.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 04 Aug 2014 01:11:29 +0000 Ramona comment 197772 at http://dagblog.com Trust the zany right-wingers http://dagblog.com/comment/197769#comment-197769 <a id="comment-197769"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/george-wills-backhanded-tribute-sherrod-brown-18762">George Will&#039;s Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Trust the zany right-wingers to work themselves into a perfect lather...Today, the GOP is a conservative party, with less diversity than exists within Britain’s Labor and Conservative parties, and more ideological uniformity than any major American party has had in this century.</p> </blockquote> <p>George Will, 1978</p> <p>He's always had a maverick streak.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:52:22 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 197769 at http://dagblog.com You mean this one?  (Your http://dagblog.com/comment/197741#comment-197741 <a id="comment-197741"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/197738#comment-197738">Do you have any comment on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You mean <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-02/house-passes-694-million-u-s-border-plan-amid-criticism.html">this one</a>?  (Your link didn't work.)  I might, but my post here is about George Will and I'd like to keep the comments on topic.  Why don't you write a post about it and I'll comment there.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Aug 2014 21:14:16 +0000 Ramona comment 197741 at http://dagblog.com Do you have any comment on http://dagblog.com/comment/197738#comment-197738 <a id="comment-197738"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/george-wills-backhanded-tribute-sherrod-brown-18762">George Will&#039;s Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ramona, do you have a comment on the Republican <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c113:1:./temp/~c1132Lz30w:e14530:">Bill 5230</a> on protecting the children at the border? Passed yesterday in the US House of Representatives?</p> <p>Sections of it:</p> <blockquote> <p>TITLE I--PROTECTING CHILDREN</p> <p>SEC. 101. REPATRIATION OF UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHILDREN.</p> <p>Section 235(a) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232(a)) is amended--</p> <p>(i) by amending the subparagraph heading to read as follows: `AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES'; and (ii) in the matter preceding clause (i), <strong>by striking `countries contiguous to the United States' and inserting `Canada, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and any other foreign country that the Secretary determines appropriate'.</strong>.............</p> <p>E) by inserting after clause (i) the following:</p> <p>`(ii)<strong> may not be placed in the immediate custody of a nongovernmental sponsor or otherwise released from the custody</strong> of the United States Government until the child is repatriated...</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Aug 2014 20:11:15 +0000 NCD comment 197738 at http://dagblog.com I can say  this because I am http://dagblog.com/comment/197734#comment-197734 <a id="comment-197734"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/george-wills-backhanded-tribute-sherrod-brown-18762">George Will&#039;s Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I can say  this because I am old:</p> <p>George Will has found permanent senility in his old age. hahahah</p> <p>You already know that I have written often concerning this old Buckley nut. And as I have pointed out several times, his editor can do nothing about it!</p> <p>But that is okay. At least he does not check in with DeMint prior to every publication.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Aug 2014 19:11:54 +0000 Richard Day comment 197734 at http://dagblog.com I agree, Momoe.  They both http://dagblog.com/comment/197733#comment-197733 <a id="comment-197733"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/197732#comment-197732">GW is worried about his own</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree, Momoe.  They both need to stay right where they are for now.  It gives me reason to hope, knowing people like that are there.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Aug 2014 19:10:43 +0000 Ramona comment 197733 at http://dagblog.com GW is worried about his own http://dagblog.com/comment/197732#comment-197732 <a id="comment-197732"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/george-wills-backhanded-tribute-sherrod-brown-18762">George Will&#039;s Backhanded Tribute to Sherrod Brown</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>GW is worried about his own career. He knows the country is moving away from the fringe right.  He is trying to keep from loosing readers. </p> <p>Brown and Warren have more power in Congress then they would have in the Whitehouse. We need more of them in Congress.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:46:17 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 197732 at http://dagblog.com