dagblog - Comments for "Jeffrey Goldberg on the State of European Jewry" http://dagblog.com/link/jeffrey-goldberg-state-european-jewry-18828 Comments for "Jeffrey Goldberg on the State of European Jewry" en Well, you do know that Hitler http://dagblog.com/comment/198609#comment-198609 <a id="comment-198609"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198607#comment-198607"> </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, you do know that Hitler and his cronies were never really too fond of Berlin.  Kind of a teeny bit of justice that Berlin is where he saw his end.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:44:09 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 198609 at http://dagblog.com   http://dagblog.com/comment/198607#comment-198607 <a id="comment-198607"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198585#comment-198585">Here&#039;s an article from the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p><span style="font-size:13.142857551574707px"><em>Germany is probably one of a handful of nations in Europe that Jews remain fundamentally secure,</em> </span></p> <p>  True, (and ironic).  Germany today is  one of the most liberal societies around--I believe that the gay mayor of Berlin is a serious contender for the next chancellor.   Put together with the strongly pacifist tendency in Japan, and we see that nothing is forever.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:57:19 +0000 jollyroger comment 198607 at http://dagblog.com Peracles, http://dagblog.com/comment/198597#comment-198597 <a id="comment-198597"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198587#comment-198587">Peracles did not &quot;support the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Peracles,</p> <p>I'm off to "paperless office training" for old dogs needing to learn new tricks.  When I started working for the USDOL after law school in 1986, we had one fax machine in the office and only the head solicitor and office manager were allowed to go near it.  </p> <p>Look, I won't lie to you and pretend that I'm happy with much of what you wrote, or how I feel you sometimes choose to debate.  But please do accept my apology for whatever part that I played in causing you to fly the coop.  FWIW, I have learned from you and I hope you understand that in my world that's a real compliment.  And it's genuine.</p> <p>With a limited amount of free time that I have in real life (like many of us I'm sure), the last thing I want to do is discuss important issues among the converted.  On this I know we agree.  </p> <p>As to the "team" thing, as you know it's an expression, and I used it at the wrong time.  The last thing I'd want to do is hide behind other folks and "other" you or anyone else.  Heaven forbid.  I cannot speak for others who chose to run with my use of the term for other purposes. </p> <p>This place is not the same without you Peracles.  </p> <p>Peace brother.</p> <p>Bruce </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:17:01 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 198597 at http://dagblog.com Not offended. I repent of http://dagblog.com/comment/198596#comment-198596 <a id="comment-198596"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198595#comment-198595">Gotta go to work and did not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not offended. I repent of straying off topic.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:15:26 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 198596 at http://dagblog.com Gotta go to work and did not http://dagblog.com/comment/198595#comment-198595 <a id="comment-198595"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198594#comment-198594">I guess we are getting off</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gotta go to work and did not mean to offend you.  </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:59:57 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 198595 at http://dagblog.com I guess we are getting off http://dagblog.com/comment/198594#comment-198594 <a id="comment-198594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198592#comment-198592">Aaron, you&#039;re the best, but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I guess we are getting off-topic.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:57:56 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 198594 at http://dagblog.com Aaron, you're the best, but http://dagblog.com/comment/198592#comment-198592 <a id="comment-198592"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198590#comment-198590">As I remember it, you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Aaron, you're the best, but not on this thread, please!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:20:57 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 198592 at http://dagblog.com You have to have the http://dagblog.com/comment/198591#comment-198591 <a id="comment-198591"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198587#comment-198587">Peracles did not &quot;support the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You have to have the appropriate "stuff" in the water to brine a good corned beef. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:18:53 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 198591 at http://dagblog.com As I remember it, you http://dagblog.com/comment/198590#comment-198590 <a id="comment-198590"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198587#comment-198587">Peracles did not &quot;support the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As I remember it, you defended the coup on the grounds that Allende had nationalized industries. Also, Chile was not lucky getting a democracy replaced by a bloody dictatorship. In the real world, the alternative to Pinochet wasn't mass slaughter, it was democracy.<br />  </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:52:54 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 198590 at http://dagblog.com Peracles did not "support the http://dagblog.com/comment/198587#comment-198587 <a id="comment-198587"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/198555#comment-198555">I didn&#039;t really follow the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Peracles did not "support the CIA's overthrow of Allende" - he noted that a leader embracing bloodthirsty Communists, ISIS, Nazis, Khmer Rouge, KKK racists, Taliban, or other horrid fringes of society can cause a country to panic and respond in a bloody overblown fashion. In Indonesia, the response to Communist intrigue was 500,000 Indonesians killed. This is the real world, boys and girls. Relatively speaking, Chile was lucky.</p> <p>Re: "at least one regular poster. stopped posting after things got tense in the comment thread", if it refers to me, I stopped posting because I got tired of re-explaining ad nauseum what I saw as fairly obvious points like paragraph #1. For politeness' sake, I'll spare you my thoughts on UK kosher delis.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:03:01 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 198587 at http://dagblog.com